ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/9246045/ , [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #62 , maps\download\DotA v6.83d-fixed.w3x

Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #62
Your Warcraft III Username: Bejitajap

Violator's Warcraft III Username: StatsMatterMost, green_mind, trolls2017, mildseven

Violated Rule(s): Teammate (pudge), game ruiner; feeder, trolling, would not help team whatsoever, and would constantly hook his allies just to troll or get them killed. I could go on and on, and our entire team tried !votekicking numerous times, but to no avail as the opposing side would NOT kick; regardless of the proof/explanations that was being provided to them.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): @10min, 20-30min, and the last remainder of the match.
Any further thoughts: This is my 1st Ban Request. There has been multiple games that I've wanted to report but ended up letting it slide, due to not knowing how to properly post the replay link etc, but this game was the last straw. Besides the trolling from our teammate, it was a very fun game and if he would've been kicked like our entire team felt he should've been, it would've made for an amazing experience using ENT hostbot.

The reasoning behind asking for the opposing sides' bans is due to the fake obliviousness and the taunting/mocking all throughout the game they portrayed== daring me to report them, and that nothing would be done. I hope that you take the time to review this case thoroughly; as this is one of the worst cases of troll abuse and !votekick abuse I've delt with in a long time and I've been playing DotA off and on since '02.

Thank you for taking the time out of your day to look into this for me. This is not only for myself, nor just for my teamates; but for the ENT community as a whole- for the better. Again, thank you.

The violated rules that @bejitajap is claiming are completely false. In regards to game ruining... the game lasted a competitive 56 minutes. From our standpoint pudge was not seen as a game ruiner. In regards to feeding, @bejitajap (as Tide) had the most deaths on sentinels. In regards to not helping team... pudge was seen pushing out lanes and helping team in battles when required. At no point did pudge hook his teammates to their death. Sure, he missed a few hooks, but he landed quite a few as well. If the replay of this game is to be reviewed, you will not find one example of pudge hooking his teammate to a death.

I think there is a reason @bejitajap has never posted a ban request before because he clearly does not know what justifies a ban... or an in game !votekick for that matter. Starting an unjustified !votekick and then expecting everyone to blindly vote !yes just because he does not like his play or the outcome of the game is !votekick abuse.

Mullinium17 wrote:The violated rules that @bejitajap is claiming are completely false. In regards to game ruining... the game lasted a competitive 56 minutes. From our standpoint pudge was not seen as a game ruiner. In regards to feeding, @bejitajap (as Tide) had the most deaths on sentinels. In regards to not helping team... pudge was seen pushing out lanes and helping team in battles when required. At no point did pudge hook his teammates to their death. Sure, he missed a few hooks, but he landed quite a few as well. If the replay of this game is to be reviewed, you will not find one example of pudge hooking his teammate to a death.

I think there is a reason @bejitajap has never posted a ban request before because he clearly does not know what justifies a ban... or an in game !votekick for that matter. Starting an unjustified !votekick and then expecting everyone to blindly vote !yes just because he does not like his play or the outcome of the game is !votekick abuse.

"At no point did pudge hook his teammates"

If you take the time to review this gameplay, you will clearly see he hooked us multiple times at the beginning-mid gameplay. The poster making his case above was the one doing the same thing ingame, stating that he had "no proof" therfore would not warrant the !yes on votekick; YET LATER then AGREED that pudge should be banned at around @33min.

Yes pudge pushed a few lanes throughout the match but that was only whenever he wasn't trolling and griefing. He bought lothars and other ridiculous items and joked about it.

Please take the time to review the match, as the above poster is only defending @StatsMatterMost to save his own ass.

Thanks

Notice in my original post, I wrote "At no point did pudge hook his teammates to their death."

Yet in @bejitajap reply, he chooses to simply quote "At no point did pudge hook his teammates". Funny right?

@bejitajap... please post an exact time when pudge hooked one of his teammates which caused his teammate to die. With out this evidence, your requests are without warrant and simply folly.

^ Negative. Again, you're just trying to save your own ass because you as well was at fault in that match for not using !votekick when it was warranted. You even stated midgame that yeah, okay, "i will vote to kick pudge now".

This IS evidence. Feel free to take some more time out of your day to review it for yourself, as you'll notice the replay link is above, via OP. Also, please don't bring sarcasm into this; it only shows your maturity. No hard feelings, I have nothing against you man; but you wasn't even on the team Pudge was griefing on, so unless you've watched the replay anything you say here henceforth holds absolutely no merit.

https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/9246045/

Can we please get a Mod or Admin to step in and take a look at this case-- I realize you all are extremely busy but I really do believe this needs to be looked at ASAP. Thank you for all the hard work you do, staff.

lol... a moderator is not going to look through a 56 minute game for an incident you are being very vague about. There is NOTHING at the 10 min mark you specified in your original post.

I'll write this one more time... maybe you can conjure up something this time.... post an exact time when pudge hooked one of his teammates which caused his teammate to die. With out this evidence, your requests are without warrant and simply folly.

All the mod wants to see is 1) time of incident and 2) what exactly did pudge do at that time that warrants a ban. I'm pretty sure your reply will contain more non-sense and none of these facts that are needed to constitute a ban on anyone.

Lastly, because a teammate of mine said "I will vote to kick pudge now", it's funny that you think I'm the one who said it... I realize now you have no idea who was playing as who. It's even funnier that you think an enemy wanting to votekick someone is evidence of pudge throwing the game.

@bejitajap can you please be more specific in your your time stamps. You can PM me more specific time stamps. i will edit the post and write them in. If it is not done within 3 days i will deny this request.

Even though pudge was slightly trollish and just by the things he said in chat i believe its intentional and he wanted to piss you off.

Yet it was hard for the enemy team to understand whats going on, so no ban on them

StatsMatterMost banned 2 days