ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9608754
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #89
Your Warcraft III Username: Noreia
Violator's Warcraft III Username: kevinandperrygo
Violated Rule(s): as to hide units
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):round 6
Any further thoughts:

As per our conversation in game, I apologised and told him the units I antistucked (6 x EA). ALSO, Noreia tried to votekick for a non rule breaking reason. This is votekick abuse, so should he be banned too???

Also, it had ZERO effect on the game. I was honest within about 20 seconds of the infraction happening.

DingShangWangSa wrote:As per our conversation in game, I apologised and told him the units I antistucked (6 x EA). ALSO, Noreia tried to votekick for a non rule breaking reason. This is votekick abuse, so should he be banned too???

Also, it had ZERO effect on the game. I was honest within about 20 seconds of the infraction happening.

A rule violation is a rule violation whether or not it has impact on the game.

Otherwise I can just save the game right before send on level 15 and if it doesn't make anyone lag enough to fail send I can claim I shouldn't be banned because it had no impact

Vinktar wrote:

DingShangWangSa wrote:As per our conversation in game, I apologised and told him the units I antistucked (6 x EA). ALSO, Noreia tried to votekick for a non rule breaking reason. This is votekick abuse, so should he be banned too???

Also, it had ZERO effect on the game. I was honest within about 20 seconds of the infraction happening.

A rule violation is a rule violation whether or not it has impact on the game.

Otherwise I can just save the game right before send on level 15 and if it doesn't make anyone lag enough to fail send I can claim I shouldn't be banned because it had no impact

Right okay Vinktar - so based on your logic I should submit a ban request for Noreia's votekick vote???

kevinandperrygo wwarned.