preteamer_01 AND preteamer_02 europe.battle.net

[NOD]

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/customstats/riskd ... e/9919946/
Game Name: [ENT] Risk Devolution #57
Your Warcraft III Username: Nod-
Violator's Warcraft III Username: preteamer_01 AND preteamer_02
Violated Rule(s): Preteaming
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):Date: 19/10/2017, 12:24
Any further thoughts:

If you check any game these 2 play they always preteam, and once in a while there will be a third guy preteamer_03
all from same country. always preteam.

thanks.

[Zeratul]

Pre-teaming isn't against the rules atm

http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... ng:RDRules

[NOD]

ive been talking to aRt)Y. Risk devolution requires its own set of rules as the ones listed do not apply to that game
however to sum up one of the msot important ones, in a free for all game like risk, preteaming is a no no.

[Zeratul]

ive been talking to aRt)Y. Risk devolution requires its own set of rules as the ones listed do not apply to that game
however to sum up one of the msot important ones, in a free for all game like risk, preteaming is a no no.

Can be the case, but until the rule is set in place, it's not bannable and rules only affect when they are set (meaning it wont affect this ban request either)

[Krastus]

Problem with risk games is that, even if we review the games with replay, there's no way to punish the offenders, and trust me, only the worst of the worst are marked - on the website. There needs to be a mechanism to prevent ruining of the games, but if you don't want that, then you're basically giving free hand to the toxic players of risk community.

[Arker]

Preteaming in a FFA game like Risk completely ruins it for everyone involved. Not only does it influence the outcome of the game, it wastes everyone else's time and leaves a sour taste. If it's not bannable now I say we push for it to be?

[TheRealSpirit]

Punishing them will be the first and the biggest step we do to let everyone know that there is a team leading the community to the right way .
So i suggest to start with them since they are the real annoying game ruiners .

[Jabba41]

Denied, no rule was broken

[Zeratul]

Punishing them will be the first and the biggest step we do to let everyone know that there is a team leading the community to the right way .
So i suggest to start with them since they are the real annoying game ruiners .

The first (and "biggest) step will be posting a suggestion, and ask for the community input, to change the rules (provide arguments to why it should be bannable, etc.) - Without a current/active rule, you wont be getting anyone punished/banned for this.