ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/replay.php?id=10074559
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #22
Your Warcraft III Username: nameisnumbers
Violator's Warcraft III Username: NoObscaptain
Violated Rule(s): Bully send on SIX
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts: Sending on 6 is usually a pretty poor decision in most cases, but this one was straight uninformed. Not only was it an awful decision but it was 100% not agreed upon by team, and as you can see the results are laughable. There is not place for people like this on the 1200+.
Please act accordingly.

Hey ,

U read the rules ?
U know when 3 ppl agree to send u need to follow ?

(10:21 / Allied) NoObscaptain: go 6
(10:22 / Allied) NoObscaptain: pls
(10:23 / Allied) Farook: shit game
(10:27 / Allied) nameisnumbers: no
(10:31 / Allied) NoObscaptain: GO PLS
(10:33 / Allied) nameisnumbers: omfg no
(10:39 / Allied) wincidion: sure gp
(10:59 / Allied) Farook: lets go then

Calls can be good or bad u never know for 100 % the right decision.

Ye ghery is right, only 100% right decision in ltd is to not let him make calls. Send 6 is risky sometimes it work sometimes it don't

Ghery is right here and noobscaptain should not be ban for that if 3 people agree.

But, Noobscaptain tk almost 50% of the time, make mix build and overbuild totaly useless (exemple :with engi and add or other stuff).
He ruined a lot of game and he can send 3 to 4 because Mr need 4 income and doesn't give a shit of teamate / win the game ! He's clearly a random add to be a real kid.

He should be out of 1200+ games from a long.. but guess now half of 1200+ players are just terrible, it's kind of ent18 atm anyway just give you my opinion on the subject.

Regards,

Wezy

Denied. 3/4 on the team agreed to send, despite it potentially being a bad decision.

As far as the other accusations of TK against the player, make a BRQ or it will never get dealt with.

Processing.