Page 1 of 1

[DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 4:35 pm
by eternal_fame
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10142658
Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #29
Your Warcraft III Username: eternal_fame
Violator's Warcraft III Username: s0ruffpuppy
Violated Rule(s): votekick abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): he votekicked abused minimum 2 times. also at min 40 game time he left me to die, while he was full hp and enemy survived on 1 hit he could have easily at least taken the kill but he tk-ed me
Any further thoughts: he did votekick abuse the next game as well https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10142807 to wisp

Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse

Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 4:43 pm
by DotAKiasS]MzZ
Hello, @eternal_fame

After a view into this case, I have concluded that He indeed did a bit flame being hursh, as well he was continously issued a illegal !votekick abuse.

Afterwards, there was no pressence of a kick but he was persistent with kicking that player out.

Regards,

Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse

Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:16 am
by ruffpuppy
@ethernal_fame when you are feeder with 800 Eli and more lost games then won don’t throw the solo on the only guy on the team above 1000 and when you do . Don’t feed FB ... simply because at this point it looks like you are game ruining . That’s why it was the VK . You threw a solo despite beeing called and despite multiple requests to let me carry your feeding ass

Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse

Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2017 2:32 am
by WolfPackMama
Everyone knows ruff has a bit of an attitude (bit of unjustified attitude, to be precise, nothing wrong with having one if you can prove to be good for one). You learn to use the !ignore function before it happens to you, or dodge him when you can.
On a side note, if more than half the players ignore you every game, think about who's to blame?

Unjustified votekicks by stating things that aren't enough to be recognized as game throwing, or game ruining.
- Not calling misses isn't bannable. Any good player has a habit to look at the minimap once every few seconds.
- Not warding isn't bannable either. I do know that it's common practice that the mid wards first batch, since it can farm without having it's core late, but as the team's only support, you should step up to ward if your mid hasn't.
- Last hitting a hero kill isn't bannable either. It's rude, but that's about it. If you want your E-penis to grow up, first two things on the list will help you have less deaths compared to you having less kills from team mates last hitting you. And it rounds up to better KDA.
- "Stealing" runes isn't a bannable offence. Once again, it's rude and mildly dumb, especially if you've a bottle. But it's not an offence on it's own feat.

Review:
Two votekicks were initiated, both without solid ground, out of pure annoyance. Neither processed. Player "Stalagmit" voted on both.
(09:34 / All) S0RuffPuppy: !votekick fame
(17:50 / All) S0RuffPuppy: !votekick fame

Verdict:
Bannable offence on two votekick abuses.

Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse

Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2017 7:27 pm
by ruffpuppy
(07:31) eternal_fame killed S0RuffPuppy
tottaly unjustified LOL. he feeed FB after throwing solo adn then kills teammates. and you wonder why i vote kick him

Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse

Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2017 11:47 pm
by eternal_fame
dont make stuff up

Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse

Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:47 am
by BeerLord
(09:34 / All) kazaka91: A votekick against player [eternal_fame] has been started by player [S0RuffPuppy].
(17:50 / All) kazaka91: A votekick against player [eternal_fame] has been started by player [S0RuffPuppy].

Both vote-kick attempts were abusive.
s0ruffpuppy banned 2 days for votekick abuse.