[ID] I would like this to be reviewed by other mods please -Ark

[ArkaTekK]

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10088809
Game Name: [ENT] Island Defense #1
Your Warcraft III Username: ArkaTekK
Violator's Warcraft III Username: o13sidi4n @ europe.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Using 3rd party software, Macros
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 2:43 - 2:44
Any further thoughts: This ban request was reviewed by Haunt,and I was was wondering if it is possible if it can get reviewed by another moderator please, thanks. In my previous post haunt had stated: "I honestly can't see the macro here. He didn't have 5 wall attempts within 5 seconds, max 2. Even I can do it that fast."


The proof is at 2:43 - 2:44 where you can clearly see that once highlighting his builder, you can see all the (b + w) attempts made within 1 second, it was 4*. (Pleasee watch this part carefully, and in 1/2 speed and also normal, you can see all the attempts of walls he was going to make within a matter of 1 second)

here's original post: viewtopic.php?f=24&t=121300&p=471550#p471550

and heres some screenshots for further proof
img 1:
img 2:
img 3:
img 4:

please watch 1/2 speed, the time between the last two images are hard to see the quick build + wall attempts he makes while watching the replay, if you pay attention closely though and in slow motion, the use of Macros definitely looks obvious, but just please take time to watch, thanks!

wc3 shot 1.jpg (414.28 KiB) Viewed 764 times

wc3 shot 2.jpg (422.65 KiB) Viewed 764 times

wc3 shot 3.jpg (426.94 KiB) Viewed 764 times

wc3 shot 4.jpg (488.93 KiB) Viewed 764 times

[Panopticon]

Watching it at 1/2 speed makes it seem he's using a macro, and isn't really reliable for that. Not to mention a possible delay in commands on his side.

Use DRM for things like this.

[Zeratul]

Review:

Looking through DRM, cant be considered a macro tbh:

Code: Select all

  2:41 <o13siDi4N> 0x11: Point order: [|cffd3d3d3Tree Wall|r] (X: 1856.00, Y: -2368.00, flags: 0x0004)
  2:42 <o13siDi4N> 0x11: Point order: [|cffd3d3d3Tree Wall|r] (X: 1664.00, Y: -1984.00, flags: 0x0004)
  2:43 <o13siDi4N> 0x11: Point order: [|cffd3d3d3Tree Wall|r] (X: 1728.00, Y: -2112.00, flags: 0x0004)
  2:43 <o13siDi4N> 0x11: Point order: [|cffd3d3d3Tree Wall|r] (X: 1920.00, Y: -2112.00, flags: 0x0004)
  2:44 <o13siDi4N> 0x11: Point order: [|cffd3d3d3Tree Wall|r] (X: 1856.00, Y: -2112.00, flags: 0x0004)
  2:44 <o13siDi4N> 0x11: Point order: [|cffd3d3d3Tree Wall|r] (X: 1984.00, Y: -2112.00, flags: 0x0004)
  2:46 <o13siDi4N> 0x11: Point order: [|cffd3d3d3Tree Wall|r] (X: 1856.00, Y: -2688.00, flags: 0x0004)
  2:48 <o13siDi4N> 0x11: Point order: [|cffd3d3d3Tree Wall|r] (X: 2048.00, Y: -3136.00, flags: 0x0004)

The most he had was 2 on :43 and 2 on :44 (replay on 1/2 speed gives you the wrong idea ^^ DRM actions cant be changed, so id have to side with Haunt result on the previous brq)

This brq should be denied, as no rules were violated

[Hash]

After reviewing the replay with DRM, it didn't look like to macros to me, denied.