[LTD] zebrahead@europe.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

fabspro
Aura Tree
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:54 am

[LTD] zebrahead@europe.battle.net

Postby fabspro » Wed Jan 03, 2018 6:49 am

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10188874
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #33
Your Warcraft III Username: fabspro@uswest.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: zebrahead@europe.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Refusing to cooperate by sending alone and not save-send with teammates to win.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Zebrahead began solo upgrading the king at about 14:00 without any team agreement. This was a refusal to save and send, which caused the team to lose the game. Then at level 13/14 because he had everyone on chat ignore, he refused to send level 13 after the send had been started, instead saying he would send 14 only.
Any further thoughts: Pink (Zebrahead) ignored people in chat and played essentially his own game, independently upgrading the king and dictating (too late to be followed) which waves to send to the team despite ignoring people in chat. This frustrated any attempt to coordinate a team send. A rough timeline of a particular issue was around level 13 where after many attempts to discuss team sends, nobody responded to me. So I had little choice but to send (the other team members were a newbie who was not talkative, and Zebrahead who had chat ignored me). Just after I had sent for 13, Zebrahead unignored me and said essentially "send 14 or i will report you and you will get banned". Zebrahead of course could have unignored me sooner, or he could have sent on 13 and we would have had a great team send. Food for thought.


Lack of cooperation and teamwork is exemplified by this:
Spoiler!
(11:08 / Allied) Zebrahead: !ignore fab

(24:08 / Allied) Zebrahead: !unignore fab
...
(24:45 / Allied) Zebrahead: 14
(24:52 / Allied) fabspro: if you had said that
(24:53 / Allied) fabspro: before i sent now
(24:55 / Allied) fabspro: then we could have saved
(24:58 / Allied) fabspro: i thought u had me ignored
(25:03 / Allied) Zebrahead: i did
(25:06 / Allied) fabspro: ok
(25:08 / Allied) fabspro: 15
(25:11 / Allied) Zebrahead: and i ll report you so badly
(25:12 / Allied) fabspro: too late to save for 14
(25:28 / Allied) fabspro: there's a lesson here
...
(25:34 / Allied) Zebrahead: !ignore fab


Ban re-posted for review as I disagree with AmroN's decision not to proceed with this ban, despite clear evidence rules were violated. Thanks.

User avatar
Panopticon
Treant Protector
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 3:03 am
Has thanked: 347 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: [LTD] zebrahead@europe.battle.net

Postby Panopticon » Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:14 am

For reference, this is the ban request that was denied by @AmnoM
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=122618#p476592
PSA: Bigtits = Iambackk

tinker_666 = ta-ta

User avatar
AmnoN
ENT Staff
Posts: 2164
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:50 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: [LTD] zebrahead@europe.battle.net

Postby AmnoN » Wed Jan 03, 2018 11:42 am

@fabspro I believe that I was pretty clear on why I denied the original ban. You are very toxic (I have seen a pattern of this in the two games that I have processed ban requests for) - the only person that pink ignored was you, same with green prior to the plug pull. It is you that needs an attitude adjustment to avoid these communication issues in future, (if pink did not have a good reason to ignore you, this may have been a bit different) and you decided to send without consulting the team - orange did not have you ignored.

Also, it is not wise to challenges every decision that does not go your way on the forums. You are welcome to ask for a second opinion, but I would not suggest doing so out of spite.

fabspro
Aura Tree
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:54 am

Re: [LTD] zebrahead@europe.battle.net

Postby fabspro » Wed Jan 03, 2018 9:13 pm

@AmnoN, I am only asking for a second review because it seems extraodinary to me that ignoring players is even really allowed in LTD, because players do have to work together to send. He ignored me because I called him out on his own violation of the save-send rule, which is not a good reason in my view.

User avatar
Panopticon
Treant Protector
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 3:03 am
Has thanked: 347 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: [LTD] zebrahead@europe.battle.net

Postby Panopticon » Wed Jan 03, 2018 9:37 pm

He ignored you because of your toxic attitude towards your own team in that game, not because of the reason you claim.
PSA: Bigtits = Iambackk

tinker_666 = ta-ta

User avatar
Merex
Oversight Staff
Posts: 6626
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:45 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 297 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Re: [LTD] zebrahead@europe.battle.net

Postby Merex » Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:15 pm

Toxicity leads to being ignored. If it's an issue, then don't be toxic.

Ban request inconsistent, decision remains.
The Slap God - An EoC Story
  • ENT Rules, Guides and more can be found on our Wiki.
  • Contact the staff & interact with others by joining our Discord.
  • Now available: Host A Game UI.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests