curt@europe.battle.net ; zkrip@europe.battle.net / zkrip@ useast.battle.net

[alphaliner]

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 398106.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] HELLHALT TD #99
Your Warcraft III Username: pneis
Violator's Warcraft III Username: zkrip ; curt ; infidel
Violated Rule(s): not dropping an obvious troll (watch replay, 2k value lvl 10) ; not dropping a solo sender
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): troll ( lvl 4-end) ; solo send (lvl 11)
Any further thoughts:

well, the enemy didnt drop our troll, according 2 the fact that they have a "troll" .

Spoiler!

(22:27 / All) Curt: we have a troll too so i refuse to kick him cos then i ll be stuck with this guy and gave u a free win

(clearly NO troll on their side)

he obviously didnt troll, but was new and tried his best.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

abusing the troll on our side to win the game

Spoiler!

(16:41 / Allied) Curt: if he truly is 1.8k
(16:43 / Allied) Infidel: oj u need to up
(16:45 / Allied) pneis: is it even fun playing this when u leak every round
(16:46 / Allied) pneis: lu
(16:48 / Allied) Curt: ther we kinda need to send

after reading chat log, they didnt even try 2 help their new teammate till lvl 10.

instead they want 2 drop their new player and drop our troll after.

Spoiler!

Infidel: look kick lagamer 1st and then Ill yes vote on yours

why would u drop a player that is just new ? help him early lvls and hell do fine.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i feel like1-2 days ban 4 the following player will help em rethink their attitutde.

[Unitil]

zkrip solo sends 3 ballistas on 14 (last level) while holding onto 2.4k lumber for a potential team send. There was no communication on your guys end with regards to sending, and no one sent in general unless you count level 1.

Will not ban individuals for failure to votekick as "trolling" is a relative term, specially when you've not noted the specific rules the user has broken.

Code: Select all

Attempt #1
(21:52 / All) pneis: hes trolling
(22:13 / All) pneis: leaked full wave
(22:16 / All) pneis: just drop him

Pre-attempt #2
(23:48 / All) pneis: its more like fairplay
(23:52 / All) pneis: dropping an oobvious troll
(25:09 / All) zkrip: I'm not trolling
(25:24 / All) zkrip: trying to up lumber so I can go merc

Attempt #2
(26:31 / All) pneis: hes on -500 score

Afterwards, you attempt to votekick another player for not voting !yes when there were two individuals (Infidel and Curt) did not vote !yes on your votekick attempts.

You're required to provide valid evidence/reasons that the user is breaking one of ENT Gaming rules. Simply stating the user is "trolling" is not valid evidence. Looking over the chat logs, you tried to providing one line of advice to blue, and moved on to requesting the user to leave and calling him useless. This is likely what led him to be resistant to any advice you provided in general.

This request is denied, in the future please provide valid rules the user has broken when initiating a votekick attempt. Also, try to guide the user better before attempting a votekick. As the user is newer, if the user refuses to cooperate, then it can be considered game ruining.

Code: Select all

It is possible to game ruin by being new. In this case, votekick will only be valid if the new player refuses to learn and cooperate. Just because someone is a newbie or bad does not mean he is intentionally game ruinning.

Processing.