ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10475215
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #81
Your Warcraft III Username: mudman
Violator's Warcraft III Username: lionking_
Violated Rule(s): vote kick
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): around round 7
Any further thoughts: votekick for no reason?

"votekick for no reason?"

What to say to this...... if u read the chat u can see that this guy mudman insult and flame over the complete game, What kind of behavior is that?
Pure toxic and hard ego player, this votekick was for sure WITH reason. How arrogant someone must be to report this after showing this behaviour just lol.
This should be denieded and this guy mudman should get warned for flaming and insulting

There's little to no flame coming from him, and that votekick was abusive in all forms.

dia wrote:"votekick for no reason?"

What to say to this...... if u read the chat u can see that this guy mudman insult and flame over the complete game, What kind of behavior is that?
Pure toxic and hard ego player, this votekick was for sure WITH reason. How arrogant someone must be to report this after showing this behaviour just lol.
This should be denieded and this guy mudman should get warned for flaming and insulting

it was a votekick under the basis that i "ghosted" which i never did, so yes it was an abusive votekick.

@Apoth imo u say its "little flame" for real ??? if u didnt read the chatlog why u write sensless things ???
@MudMan in my opinion it was not a abusive votekick, after u flamed rly hard he didnt start a votekick with the intention to kick u, he did it to show u how annoying u are. Also noone voted !yes so this is just a trash report.

Just want to show u guys the chatlog
After Team decide not to send 5:

(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: rofl
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: 5 was gg
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: noobs
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: stfu
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: 5 was gg
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: fkin robot noobs
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: Calling u a noob
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: is a fact
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: not an insult
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: its a fact
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: terrible players
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: all of u
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: said no to 5
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: terrible noobs
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: Why do u send bo vs ygg
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: and not chariot
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: its fortified?
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: lil bitch
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: stop being wrong
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: in every way
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: gg wp
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: noobs
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: ofc we lose
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: u suck cock
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: i said ur bad
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: its a fact
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: go learn to play
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: u fkin monkey
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: terrible
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: NOOB
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: everyone fkin hates u
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: even enemy team
(00:00 / Allied) Mudman: and u terrible noobs wanted to lose on 7 instead
(00:00 / All) Mudman: this is literally the worst team ever

1 sided context?? u should show the other party who is flaming back
second of all, spamming noobs noobs noobs noobs isnt really excessive flaming by a long shot.
and 3rd of all the grounds of the votekick do not hold, making it still an abuse.
if you think i broke the flaming rules, make a separate report. this is regarding a votekick

I dont think even excesive flaming is kickable. U are supposed to use !ignore command and not !votekick if someone flames u.

Mudman was being toxic. The votekick was abusive though. As Brandom says just use !ignore and maybe report after game if it's excessive enough (in this case I would say not). With that said it was one votekick with zero votes. I would give a warning but you already have one, so banned 1 day.