Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 980428.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #91
Your Warcraft III Username: master_paln
Violator's Warcraft III Username:
yendal
uswest.battle.ne (purposely game ruin)
thoj
uswest.battle.net (feeds 7 times, dies to creeps, uses atropos sleep spell on team mates at fountain, afk 5 mins, game ruin)
nike.blac))
uswest.battle.net (refuse to kick)
lucker
europe.battle.net (refuse to kick)
3lood
uswest.battle.net (refuse to kick)
thoj
uswest.battle.net (refuse to kick)
(07:15 / All) 3lood: only your team can kick
(players clearly needs to read the rules about kicking throwers)
Violated Rule(s): game ruin + refusal to kick after 4 tries, waited 15 mins so they can win game easily
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): yendal starts trolling as game starts, ppl refuse to kick for 15 mins after it is clearly stated multiple times. They waited as long as possible allowing them to farm up and win game easily. Phoenix then feeds 7 times dies to creeps and goes afk for 5 mins. they refuse to kick him as well. So Yendal and phoenix ban for game ruin, and all people who kept refusing to kick for a long time. they are just as bad as the game ruiners and knew exactly what was going on. As yendal never came to any lane
Any further thoughts: Yendal has 300 elo and admit he game ruins dozens of times he should get a perma ban from that acc. Not sure how he is still allowed to play. 300 elo is impossible unless you purposely ruin. Also the other ppl refusing to kick was obvious. They wanted easy win and played stupid after we explained what he was doing
[DOTA] lucker, nike, thoj, 3lood, yendal
Moderator: ENT Staff
- kunkka
- Treant
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:53 pm
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: [DOTA] lucker, nike, thoj, 3lood, yendal
Before game started and pink said anything, this happened...
Lobby chat:
So you asked him to come to your team, then you flamed and threat to ban him before game even started. Now he's probably banned and you are happy? Rofl

Lobby chat:
Spoiler!
Spoiler!
So you asked him to come to your team, then you flamed and threat to ban him before game even started. Now he's probably banned and you are happy? Rofl
Re: [DOTA] lucker, nike, thoj, 3lood, yendal
@kunkka You have way to much time on your hands lol.. do you have a job?
And just FYI I ask low ELO to join my team so i win more ELO. Sometimes Yendal tries and plays normal, but i've seen him purposely game ruin a lot. So was just letting him know that im aware of his methods and he just trolled from start
And just FYI I ask low ELO to join my team so i win more ELO. Sometimes Yendal tries and plays normal, but i've seen him purposely game ruin a lot. So was just letting him know that im aware of his methods and he just trolled from start
- DOTA_TRASHCANS
- Treant
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:27 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: [DOTA] lucker, nike, thoj, 3lood, yendal
I agree with Godrik's assessment here. Letting people know of Yendal's intentions is not flaming. Not sure what the motive here from Kunkka is, but anyone reviewing the replay objectively will surely tell what's going on with yendal.
<3 Trashcans
- kunkka
- Treant
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:53 pm
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: [DOTA] lucker, nike, thoj, 3lood, yendal
Godrik wrote:do you have a job?
can we calm down and focus on the ban request here? For example, let's talk about the way you tried to trigger him before game started. How did you expect him to react? "Oh thanks mate for letting me know I ruin a lot! I'll buy courier and wards for you so you can ks better with dagon tiny!"
?
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:49 am
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: [DOTA] lucker, nike, thoj, 3lood, yendal
kunkka wrote:Godrik wrote:do you have a job?
can we calm down and focus on the ban request here? For example, let's talk about the way you tried to trigger him before game started. How did you expect him to react? "Oh thanks mate for letting me know I ruin a lot! I'll buy courier and wards for you so you can ks better with dagon tiny!"
?
So your logic is... he ruins a lot, so by "triggering" him he should be excused of it? lmao. I agree there are a lot of unnecessary ban requests, but a kid like this deserves to be banned. blatant ruining or someone that is so vulnerable to getting triggered and ruining doesnt deserve to play, or at the VERY least should get a lengthy ban.
- kunkka
- Treant
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:53 pm
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: [DOTA] lucker, nike, thoj, 3lood, yendal
1B_Fantom wrote:I agree there are a lot of unnecessary ban requests, but a kid like this deserves to be banned. blatant ruining or someone that is so vulnerable to getting triggered and ruining doesnt deserve to play, or at the VERY least should get a lengthy ban.
Yep agreed. He's a ruiner and needs to be banned

- Slomosapien
- Treant
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:12 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests