Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11294522
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #14
Your Warcraft III Username: eld3r
Violator's Warcraft III Username: tdnoob
Violated Rule(s): solo send
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): lvl 3, 3rd minute
Any further thoughts:
Our plan was to send straight 7. he wanted to send 3 alone on level 3. The team said a few times dont send. But he still solo send on lvl 3.
[LTD] @ tdnoob
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:17 pm
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
i had most wood and i could afford a scout send which it worked as planned... hes salty cause my plan worked we scouted them and we knew sending full 7 is great... this is a viable strategy 1 guy to send 3 for scout when hes pushing and he can afford it! if u proceed the ban it will only prove ur ignorance as LTD player!
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Whole Team said dont send. Save for lvl 7. You refused to cooperate with the whole Team and just solo send.
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:17 pm
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
sometimes your team doesnt make the right calls as u proved this game with ur 14 call and going for king 10 instead of sending full vs weak team on 10, u just proved to me that most of the players dont understand every sense of the game!
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
It doesnt matter what would be good or not. "not solo send" is a rule u broke. You also refused to cooperate with Team. being a dickhead and complain about others the whole game. GO Play solo instead.
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
(00:41 / Allied) highallthetime: straight 7?
(00:51 / Allied) eld3r: ye
(01:49 / Allied) Emi1: reg 7?
(01:53 / Allied) eld3r: no idea what je smoke
(01:57 / Allied) eld3r: go just 7
(02:04 / Allied) tdnoob: 2-7
(02:08 / Allied) tdnoob: or reg 7
(02:13 / Allied) tdnoob: vote
(02:16 / Allied) tdnoob: i vote reg
(02:17 / Allied) eld3r: str 7
(02:19 / Allied) Emi1: straight
(03:34 / Allied) Emi1: we go 7
(03:45 / Allied) tdnoob: i go bo 3
(03:46 / Allied) highallthetime: dont 3 imo yo
Despite later, yellow said it was "ok" - you sent on 3 against your entire team telling you not to (It's not a 2-2 vote, your team said don't send 3, and you just went against everyone's vote); And yes, sometimes people might be blind/unaware and make shit calls, but you can't go around and make your own decision, against the entire team: Argument and try to make them see it, or else follow the team call
Given it was a 1 time only, and it dind't impact much (even yellow agreed it was okay later), i would only warn him for now, but you should be aware now to repeat it again @aaaaaaaaaa
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:17 pm
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
aaaaaaaaaa wrote:Ure the first competent mod i meet here! Thanks!
Thanks for the compliment (i'm an ex-moderator actually


-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
viewtopic.php?t=133023
viewtopic.php?t=132398
viewtopic.php?t=130598
viewtopic.php?t=128892
viewtopic.php?t=128889
viewtopic.php?t=128407
viewtopic.php?t=126688
viewtopic.php?t=126338
viewtopic.php?t=125974
viewtopic.php?t=120235
viewtopic.php?t=130007
viewtopic.php?t=131728
viewtopic.php?t=128305
viewtopic.php?t=127965
viewtopic.php?t=119158
viewtopic.php?t=116347
viewtopic.php?t=127503
As one of the incompetent ones, I can tell you this player has zero chance of getting just a warning.
viewtopic.php?t=132398
viewtopic.php?t=130598
viewtopic.php?t=128892
viewtopic.php?t=128889
viewtopic.php?t=128407
viewtopic.php?t=126688
viewtopic.php?t=126338
viewtopic.php?t=125974
viewtopic.php?t=120235
viewtopic.php?t=130007
viewtopic.php?t=131728
viewtopic.php?t=128305
viewtopic.php?t=127965
viewtopic.php?t=119158
viewtopic.php?t=116347
viewtopic.php?t=127503
As one of the incompetent ones, I can tell you this player has zero chance of getting just a warning.
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:17 pm
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
So u check chat logs but never see the replays no wonder why ur bans are often incorrect prolonged or ur not baning people that should be banned! Do what u have to idm, but in this case it was team oriented send i announced it and it worked, doesnt matter that 2 1300 elo players were against it because they dont know advanced strats and eld3r is just salty for some reason: i played few more games against him and his team was !ff and !vk or flaming! : [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #22 ; http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 294922.w3g : "(09:03 / Allied) eld3r: u fucked the whole game pink now ; (13:05 / Allied) eld3r: !votekick jer
(13:07 / Allied) clubsport: !yes
(13:09 / Allied) eld3r: !yes
(14:24 / Allied) eld3r: stop join 1200" aswell as he paused 2 times for no reasons that game
(13:07 / Allied) clubsport: !yes
(13:09 / Allied) eld3r: !yes
(14:24 / Allied) eld3r: stop join 1200" aswell as he paused 2 times for no reasons that game
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
I don't believe he intended to bash on moderators when he said what he said - This is clearly a raging childish action (expected more from you beerlord);
Anyways, given his last solo send brq is dated from May or so, 1 send that dind't rly impact much is not something that deserves so much attention, but you're the boss, after all.
Anyways, given his last solo send brq is dated from May or so, 1 send that dind't rly impact much is not something that deserves so much attention, but you're the boss, after all.
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:17 pm
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
The game before that he taunted and provoked our whole team because their warr send succeded(for which i have been banned and he should be too) :
[ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #22 :"(02:31 / All) eld3r: ff pls"
[ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #22 :"(02:31 / All) eld3r: ff pls"
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:17 pm
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
I will point this again: My send was intended to get a scout and that was the whole reason... And what i said about the mods is known from experience playing with some of them(wont mention names) , or seeing their comments on topics. maybe u should consider hiring 1600+ players to mod LTD so ban will be more fair and well understood!
- AmnoN
- ENT Staff
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:50 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Solo send was intentional and would typically be a warning to a 1-day ban max, but given history, this will not be the case.
(02:33 / Allied) tdnoob: if i can bo 3
(02:36 / Allied) tdnoob: i go for it
(02:44 / Allied) eld3r: go 7
(02:47 / Allied) eld3r: ...
(02:50 / Allied) tdnoob: im telling u
(02:53 / Allied) tdnoob: if i can bo 3
(02:54 / Allied) tdnoob: i will
(02:57 / Allied) tdnoob: for scout
(03:34 / Allied) Emi1: we go 7
(03:46 / Allied) highallthetime: dont 3 imo yo
Team clearly said not to do it. tdnoob@Europe banned 3 days for refusal to cooperate (6th offense)
(02:33 / Allied) tdnoob: if i can bo 3
(02:36 / Allied) tdnoob: i go for it
(02:44 / Allied) eld3r: go 7
(02:47 / Allied) eld3r: ...
(02:50 / Allied) tdnoob: im telling u
(02:53 / Allied) tdnoob: if i can bo 3
(02:54 / Allied) tdnoob: i will
(02:57 / Allied) tdnoob: for scout
(03:34 / Allied) Emi1: we go 7
(03:46 / Allied) highallthetime: dont 3 imo yo
Team clearly said not to do it. tdnoob@Europe banned 3 days for refusal to cooperate (6th offense)
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: showtime18 and 68 guests