Page 1 of 1
[LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 5:48 pm
by eld3r
Replay Link:
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11294522Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #14
Your Warcraft III Username: eld3r
Violator's Warcraft III Username: tdnoob
Violated Rule(s): solo send
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): lvl 3, 3rd minute
Any further thoughts:
Our plan was to send straight 7. he wanted to send 3 alone on level 3. The team said a few times dont send. But he still solo send on lvl 3.
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 5:53 pm
by aaaaaaaaaa
i had most wood and i could afford a scout send which it worked as planned... hes salty cause my plan worked we scouted them and we knew sending full 7 is great... this is a viable strategy 1 guy to send 3 for scout when hes pushing and he can afford it! if u proceed the ban it will only prove ur ignorance as LTD player!
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 5:56 pm
by eld3r
Whole Team said dont send. Save for lvl 7. You refused to cooperate with the whole Team and just solo send.
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 6:00 pm
by aaaaaaaaaa
sometimes your team doesnt make the right calls as u proved this game with ur 14 call and going for king 10 instead of sending full vs weak team on 10, u just proved to me that most of the players dont understand every sense of the game!
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 6:13 pm
by eld3r
It doesnt matter what would be good or not. "not solo send" is a rule u broke. You also refused to cooperate with Team. being a dickhead and complain about others the whole game. GO Play solo instead.
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 6:22 pm
by Zeratul
(00:41 / Allied) highallthetime: straight 7?
(00:51 / Allied) eld3r: ye
(01:49 / Allied) Emi1: reg 7?
(01:53 / Allied) eld3r: no idea what je smoke
(01:57 / Allied) eld3r: go just 7
(02:04 / Allied) tdnoob: 2-7
(02:08 / Allied) tdnoob: or reg 7
(02:13 / Allied) tdnoob: vote
(02:16 / Allied) tdnoob: i vote reg
(02:17 / Allied) eld3r: str 7
(02:19 / Allied) Emi1: straight
(03:34 / Allied) Emi1: we go 7
(03:45 / Allied) tdnoob: i go bo 3
(03:46 / Allied) highallthetime: dont 3 imo yo
Despite later, yellow said it was "ok" - you sent on 3 against your entire team telling you not to (It's not a 2-2 vote, your team said don't send 3, and you just went against everyone's vote); And yes, sometimes people might be blind/unaware and make shit calls, but you can't go around and make your own decision, against the entire team: Argument and try to make them see it, or else follow the team call
Given it was a 1 time only, and it dind't impact much (even yellow agreed it was okay later), i would only warn him for now, but you should be aware now to repeat it again
@aaaaaaaaaa
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 6:27 pm
by aaaaaaaaaa
Ure the first competent mod i meet here! Thanks!
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 6:30 pm
by Zeratul
aaaaaaaaaa wrote:Ure the first competent mod i meet here! Thanks!
Thanks for the compliment (i'm an ex-moderator actually
), and the ban request hasn't been processed yet - A moderator might see it differently than i do, i just gave my opinion on it; Just wait for their response
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:08 pm
by BeerLord
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:23 pm
by aaaaaaaaaa
So u check chat logs but never see the replays no wonder why ur bans are often incorrect prolonged or ur not baning people that should be banned! Do what u have to idm, but in this case it was team oriented send i announced it and it worked, doesnt matter that 2 1300 elo players were against it because they dont know advanced strats and eld3r is just salty for some reason: i played few more games against him and his team was !ff and !vk or flaming! : [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #22 ;
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 294922.w3g : "(09:03 / Allied) eld3r: u fucked the whole game pink now ; (13:05 / Allied) eld3r: !votekick jer
(13:07 / Allied) clubsport: !yes
(13:09 / Allied) eld3r: !yes
(14:24 / Allied) eld3r: stop join 1200" aswell as he paused 2 times for no reasons that game
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:24 pm
by Zeratul
I don't believe he intended to bash on moderators when he said what he said - This is clearly a raging childish action (expected more from you beerlord);
Anyways, given his last solo send brq is dated from May or so, 1 send that dind't rly impact much is not something that deserves so much attention, but you're the boss, after all.
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:26 pm
by aaaaaaaaaa
The game before that he taunted and provoked our whole team because their warr send succeded(for which i have been banned and he should be too) :
[ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #22 :"(02:31 / All) eld3r: ff pls"
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:32 pm
by aaaaaaaaaa
I will point this again: My send was intended to get a scout and that was the whole reason... And what i said about the mods is known from experience playing with some of them(wont mention names) , or seeing their comments on topics. maybe u should consider hiring 1600+ players to mod LTD so ban will be more fair and well understood!
Re: [LTD] @ tdnoob
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:09 pm
by AmnoN
Solo send was intentional and would typically be a warning to a 1-day ban max, but given history, this will not be the case.
(02:33 / Allied) tdnoob: if i can bo 3
(02:36 / Allied) tdnoob: i go for it
(02:44 / Allied) eld3r: go 7
(02:47 / Allied) eld3r: ...
(02:50 / Allied) tdnoob: im telling u
(02:53 / Allied) tdnoob: if i can bo 3
(02:54 / Allied) tdnoob: i will
(02:57 / Allied) tdnoob: for scout
(03:34 / Allied) Emi1: we go 7
(03:46 / Allied) highallthetime: dont 3 imo yo
Team clearly said not to do it. tdnoob@Europe banned 3 days for refusal to cooperate (6th offense)