Page 1 of 1
[LTD] ff abuse
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:51 am
by steamrogue
Replay Link:
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 402869.w3gGame Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #84
Your Warcraft III Username: steamrogue
Violator's Warcraft III Username: mungolake
Violated Rule(s): forfeit abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): level 3 they forfeit
Any further thoughts: mungolake and his friend bumpipmp were premade,so they abused ff on level 3, because teal 1200 new player leaked a bit,i think they deserve ban for ff abuse
Re: [LTD] ff abuse
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:25 am
by kasper699
so we all 4 lanes hold wars lvl1, lvl 3 teal under builds only Lod and geo and dose not up geo to cw, instead saving gold and leaks give the other team there 1st scout.
teal needs to build to hold 4 and if he dose he wont up lod for 5. all ready he is going to be useless.
game was going to be a loss saved time
"To !ff the game must evidently be lost."
that game was evidently going to be a loss.
we had no holder, ea, sprites, crabs (that rr got cav but went 3/0 after lvl 1 and i dont think would be able to be a holder) and a fail lod
i had ea and lod do you think i wanted to really FF? but that
Re: [LTD] ff abuse
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:26 am
by steamrogue
if you are not able to play untill the game end then dont join,the game didnt event start,and we had chances to win,still you prefer to ff abuse with your friend
Re: [LTD] ff abuse
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:44 am
by kasper699
the game was going to be a loss we had the advantage and could dictate the game, dew to them not scouting us, and mostly yolo units. teals only job would be be bigish for 7 in turn be strong for 10 and hold 10, i had ea to cover 8 & 12-14. but with that that free scout (letting the other team now dictate the game) if they send 1-5 would have gave us the game, since we have ea and "would have had hadies" on teal for 5 or he could not even 2 lod for 5.
Re: [LTD] ff abuse
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:56 am
by Stiff_Maistar
Seems to be !ff abuse here.
Teal leaked 12 units on level (on non send wave).
The other team leaked 11 units units.
Argument ingame for !ff seems to be:
Teal could have upgraded the geomancer into a clockwreaker to hold level 4. Than he could have buildt another LoD.
The main argument for forfeiting, that teal couldnt build the Hades so he would be useless is wrong.
You guys could for example have gotten immolation, which would have given a free level 7 hold.
You guys used !ff before you had even scouted the enemy team. For all you know they could have gone ogre yolo, or mass land mines.
If you had waited, you would have seen the nightmare and clockwreaker.
Eitherway, the !ff was too early seeing as it was only based on teal being a noob and that they got a free scout.
Re: [LTD] ff abuse
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:26 am
by MungoLake
I play on the 1200+ bot because it is meant for experienced players. On level 1 we were having to explain that teal couldn't build middle and he couldn't anti stuck which he didn't know. Sadly i didn't see his build on level 3 until it was to late, the small things are the difference between winning and losing in 1200+ due to no cross/merge. His decision to save 130 gold on level 3 although he had great units to add made no sense and continuing forward we would of had to explain every round what to build and when to make a wisp which is not how 1200+ is meant to be played. It's fun because as a team you can share ideas and strategy, this game was very unlikely winnable granted the information that was given from leaking level 3 and teals little experience on basic builds.
Re: [LTD] ff abuse
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 4:16 pm
by AmnoN
mungolake@Europe banned 8 days for FF abuse (2nd offense)
bumpimp@USWest banned 8 days for FF abuse (2nd offense)
neotanks@USEast banned 3 days for FF abuse (after being flamed briefly - did not seem to be malicious in intent and was told that game was over; being new to 1200+ did not help)
Re: [LTD] ff abuse
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 12:37 am
by Quetra
Can't find a wc3connect alias, processing