Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 499381.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #84
Your Warcraft III Username: ringkeeper
Violator's Warcraft III Username: amuro
Violated Rule(s): didnt defend base
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 27:00
Any further thoughts:
[DOTA] amuro useast.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 11:33 am
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:26 pm
Re: [DOTA] amuro useast.battle.net
Gotta love reading the ban request section. I played with amuro, he is not a bad player, and he said he was learning slark at the beginning. How is a slark going to defend when you fed like shit, your teammate have no team fight items, and no stuns, nec 130+ cs,and the other team having better teamfight??
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: [DOTA] amuro useast.battle.net
He was active in ganking and defending throughout the game. At min 27 he went to get invis rune then came directly back and engaged necro, who was in middle lane near rax.
Denied.
Denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 132 guests