ENT Gaming

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 659685.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #65
Your Warcraft III Username: Sleivkjeft
Violator's Warcraft III Username: combotrickster1
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): The entire game
Any further thoughts: He purposely played inefficiently, overbuilt when he didnt have to and refused to push despite 3 players telling him to.
He admitted to trolling:
23:08 / Allied) Sleivkjeft: you trolling or you just bad?
(23:15 / Allied) Combotrickster1: im trolling

I rest my case

@Rasskalk "Entire game" isn't a valid form of time for ban requests. You will need to modify specific times of rule violations in order for us to properly review.

Merex wrote:@Rasskalk "Entire game" isn't a valid form of time for ban requests. You will need to modify specific times of rule violations in order for us to properly review.

You were not involved in the game and you lacking insight. He played like a complete donkey and he admitted to trolling. This guy deserves a ban, simple as that.

@Rasskalk That's not how this works. You will provide me, a staff member of ENT, the necessary times to pinpoint which exact rules he violated and how it impacted the game or this will be denied.

Merex wrote:@Rasskalk That's not how this works. You will provide me, a staff member of ENT, the necessary times to pinpoint which exact rules he violated and how it impacted the game or this will be denied.

Do you not understand the concept of trolling? I'm sure there are detailed guides on the internet explaining it if it's new to you.
He entered the game with the mindset of ruining it for everyone else, not at a specific point in the game from beginning to end.
He overbuilt when he was not supposed to on basically every level, despite us repeatedly telling him not to. A good example is lvl 10 where he decided to stay 7/3 while the rest of us went 7/6. We told him it was wrong but he did not seem to care. He went 10 attack on king at lvl 7, with stomp. We told him it was too much but once again he did not care.
Refusing to communicate with your mates and trolling for the sake of trolling is VERY much banable. Why I even have to tell you this is beyond me.

@Rasskalk So let's get something straight right now.

You do not walk into my ban request section and disrespect me/the staff. You are reporting a player and not providing enough "insight" into why he was "trolling". Do you understand that concept?

Your attitude is horrible. Not sure what issues you may hold inside yourself, but do not bring it here. You will follow the reporting process with specifics the same as anyone else.

So with that being said, allow me to explain to you some things that way, when you come back in this section you are going to have full "insight" into why the ban request section works the way it does.

• Violated Rule(s):
  
  • You do not remove this from our ban request format. If you've not a clue what exactly our rules are, I will personally link you the wiki to such here.
  • The purpose of this part of our format is to identify which rule(s) exactly are being violated by suspected player so we know what to look for and how to judge accordingly.
• Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
  
  • "entire game" is not a valid form of time. We need specific times to go off of so we know where to look within the replay.
  • The purpose of this part of our format is to identify when rule(s) are being violated by suspected player. As a participant of this game, this section should be easy for you to uphold. Should you forget/lose specific times of when this happened, we've a stats/replay section you are more than willing to look at.
  • Side note: I will allow, in LTD, for you to provide me which level(s) the incident happened in. For instance, if player x broke z rule at level 7, that is fine. If he broke rule c during level 20 arena, that's also fine. This way, you can keep your report accurate and have an alternative method of timing. Aka, everyone stays happy.
• Trolling
  
  • This is not a valid rule to base your report off of. Feel free to see the link above to see our rules but no where do we even mention "trolling".
  • Since you've kindly responded to me, I will break down your "mentions" below.

Rasskalk wrote:He overbuilt when he was not supposed to on basically every level, despite us repeatedly telling him not to. A good example is lvl 10 where he decided to stay 7/3 while the rest of us went 7/6.

This alone is not ban-able but it will speak to a general game ruining violation should there be more. Just because someone decides not to push an extra couple of lumberjacks does not mean they're horrible and out to ruin games. You will need to provide more beyond this to give us a better sense of the overall "Refusing to cooperate".

Rasskalk wrote:He went 10 attack on king at lvl 7, with stomp. We told him it was too much but once again he did not care.

This is very minimal information nor is it even under violation. Again, more chatlogs/specifics will be needed out of this to have a better understanding of the environment.

The ENT staff is here to review/analyze/judge reports on a case-by-case basis. We are not here to have you dump a replay on us and make us scour through it looking for something as vague as "Trolling". Again, that's not how this works. You as a citizen of ENT hold an obligation to provide anything we ask of when it comes to ban requests and provide as much as you can. In return, we've the obligation to review, judge and enforce if necessary.

So here's what I'm going to do. I am going to deny this ban request and I want you to come back into this one, look over everything I've said to you and if after, you choose to report this player again I expect 2 things of you: Better attitude and an Accurate ban request. Otherwise, you've no business being here.