ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/11666422/
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #94
Your Warcraft III Username: bored
Violator's Warcraft III Username: KaLiPsO-RmK
Violated Rule(s): trolling
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts:

(47:21 / Allied) boredofnoobs: WHY U HAVE AGHANIM
(47:22 / Allied) boredofnoobs: STORM?
(47:27 / Allied) KaLiPsO-RmK: for fun
(47:27 / Allied) KaLiPsO-RmK: xD

Please don't tell me this is not trolling moves, he ruined game till start to the end by going alone like a ret**d, and finished by making aghanim on storm who's ofc not working.

This is not like the game were easy, we lost racks top and some mid and we turn back the game and won but it was a very hard game and we clearly couldn't make items for fun, so you can consider this "item" as trolling because he said it himself "for fun" and he knwo it is not working.

Regards

@bigtits

You need to fill out the ban requests with timestamps and a description of the game ruining actions.

Ruining the game 'start to the end' isn't helpful at all.

i don't report him for "gameruin" just for trolling as i posted in the chat "why you make aghanim on storm" he said "for fun" in a very hard game and a game who were almost lost and we couldn't have fun, i explained things, he make an item not working on his hero "for fun" thats simply trolling a game.(if you don't play dota, aghanim doesn't work with storm and he clearly know it because he said it himself "for fun")

I can vouch for bigtits. Kalipso has instances of trolling, intentional feeding and ruining in virtually all games he plays.
Actually I cant find a game where he didn't honestly.

+1 on that ban request.
Played a bunch of games with that guy and its pretty clear he is trolling hard.
Usually he tries to join the team with better elo stats and spam nonstop gibberish about stackers etc.
Once the game starts his main goal is to troll, feed and not support the team in a way that avoids direct use of bannable actions.
Problem with players like this is you cant say "timestamp xy he did this and that" its just the whole package but once u played some games with him you see his only intention is to Troll and have fun at the cost of 4 other players.

+1 Admins have to do smth againts this guy

The process doesn't work like that. Mods have to review thousands of reports and would be here all day if the only sufficient evidence you have is, "from start to end." The onus is on you to prove it by providing timestamps of them ruining the game. If you won't take the time to review it accordingly, why should anyone else? Also, saying he got an item for fun doesn't mean he intended to game-ruin. And that is why you have to prove it. Here is what you said at the beginning of the game.

(01:23 / Allied) boredofnoobs: he don't know
(01:24 / Allied) Bonechwer.: !sd sam
(01:25 / Allied) samu: -swap 5
(01:25 / Allied) boredofnoobs: to play storm
(01:25 / Allied) KaLiPsO-RmK: -swap
(01:26 / Allied) boredofnoobs: XD
(01:30 / Allied) boredofnoobs: HE DONT KNOW STORM hahaha


You're saying he doesn't know how to play storm. Could that be the reason he got scepter due to not knowing which items to get and thinking scepter works?

Also, he does get linkens when you told him to so why weren't you more proactive in giving him item selection advice instead of !ignoring him?

In all likelihood, I didn't watch the replay and he probably does ruin games but that doesn't change the fact that moderators need to treat this as innocent until proven guilty and they're not going to ban someone if they feel you're not providing enough evidence. Just because you are better than someone/are more active in ENT, doesn't mean mods should treat you as a more credible individual.

I agree with bigt

Refer to Astros's post.