ENT Gaming

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 700935.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #38
Your Warcraft III Username: r3v3ng3
Violator's Warcraft III Username: 707
Violated Rule(s): initially played with team but towards end was clearly throwing by not participating in final push which would have won the game by farming then he admitted losing on purpose because of arguments with Slar

Time of Violation (in-game or replay): admitted at 50:42

(50:14 / Allied) 707s: u ruined
(50:19 / Allied) 707s: by talking shit
(50:21 / Allied) 707s: fuckin fag
(50:25 / Allied) 707s: thats what u get
(50:27 / Allied) 707s: faggot
(50:29 / Allied) 707s: shit face
(50:40 / Allied) R3v3ng3: ok sniper
(50:42 / Allied) 707s: i lose on purpose

(50:54 / Allied) R3v3ng3: !timestamp 48:13
(50:59 / Allied) 707s: ye
(51:00 / Allied) 707s: ye
(51:00 / Allied) R3v3ng3: you admitted losing on purpose
(51:02 / Allied) 707s: go report
(51:03 / Allied) 707s: hahaha
(51:04 / Allied) R3v3ng3: you now have ban
(51:05 / Allied) 707s: fagg
Any further thoughts: please apply ban accordingly

Need specific timestamps of him throwing. Him saying he will lose on purpose doesn't mean he is playing as such. Giving this two days for a response.

@hydroponictango

Ok. no specific timestamps so you can proceed to dismissing this request.

It is good to know though that you can say you are going to lose on purpose or you lost on purpose however as long as you continue to play correctly with no perceivable instance of intentionally losing such as remaining farming while team pushes to finish there is no consequences regardless of outcome. Handy for those team mates who flame constantly. perfect response to them.

Appreciate the confirmation

Hydro <3

hydroponicTango wrote:It is good to know though that you can say you are going to lose on purpose or you lost on purpose however as long as you continue to play correctly with no perceivable instance of intentionally losing

You know the mods are volunteers right? They have lives and they want to play too right? They don't have time to go over every second of every replay in the BRQ forum. It is your job to "partner up" with the mods and list timestamps of perceivable offenses. All they're suppose to do is review your timestamps and see if they are valid and then process.

Put it this way, you're the lawyer, it is your job to prove the case. Mods are like the judges and when you've proven the case, they'll process it. It is not a judge's job to investigate the crime and prove the case.

denied. @hydroponictango We can't ban people for just saying things. Actions matter more than words in these cases. If you can't take time to review the game to provide timestamps, why should you expect us to?