[DOTA] AMOSDEF AFI SOCKGATOR
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:10 am
Your Warcraft III username: cr33per @uswest
Violator's Warcraft III username:
AMOSDEF @useast
(also AFI @europe and SOCKGATOR @useast)
Game name or map name: [ent] dota sdem us/ca #72
Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=2180422
Rule player violated: Intentional feed; Refusing to kick feeder
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): AMOSDEF fed twice within two minutes and did not listen to advice from team to go to safety but rather fed a third time before the timer hit 3:33. He did not ask for understanding until the votekick needed only a couple votes and admitted to being high and said "Yo chill out i'm just a lil high my game is tight"; If you watch the replay, you can tell right away he understands how to use the hero and that he's just feeding. I have had admins explain that when a player does not listen to their team, they are considered to be intentionally feeding.
When our team declared him to be intentionally feeding, AFI and SOCKGATOR did not vote to kick, thus allowing him to feed 2 more times in the next 7 minutes, only not dying more because we all tp'd in to save him. I have previously viewed a votekick as ambiguous from the other team and was banned myself for not voting with the team trying to kick their own player; The admin clarified that the team with the feeding player knows best and not voting for the kick is considered game ruining and bannable. The two players that played against him in his lane AGREED and voted to kick him.
Did we still win, yes. And that is the only reason he didn't feed even more. Please do not excuse his game ruining behavior and that of other offenders simply because he wasn't able to cause a loss.
Any further thoughts: There is no reason these bans should not occur. If there is doubt in the mind of the reviewer, please do not close this topic, I would like to understand how it is not feeding.
Violator's Warcraft III username:
AMOSDEF @useast
(also AFI @europe and SOCKGATOR @useast)
Game name or map name: [ent] dota sdem us/ca #72
Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=2180422
Rule player violated: Intentional feed; Refusing to kick feeder
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): AMOSDEF fed twice within two minutes and did not listen to advice from team to go to safety but rather fed a third time before the timer hit 3:33. He did not ask for understanding until the votekick needed only a couple votes and admitted to being high and said "Yo chill out i'm just a lil high my game is tight"; If you watch the replay, you can tell right away he understands how to use the hero and that he's just feeding. I have had admins explain that when a player does not listen to their team, they are considered to be intentionally feeding.
When our team declared him to be intentionally feeding, AFI and SOCKGATOR did not vote to kick, thus allowing him to feed 2 more times in the next 7 minutes, only not dying more because we all tp'd in to save him. I have previously viewed a votekick as ambiguous from the other team and was banned myself for not voting with the team trying to kick their own player; The admin clarified that the team with the feeding player knows best and not voting for the kick is considered game ruining and bannable. The two players that played against him in his lane AGREED and voted to kick him.
Did we still win, yes. And that is the only reason he didn't feed even more. Please do not excuse his game ruining behavior and that of other offenders simply because he wasn't able to cause a loss.
Any further thoughts: There is no reason these bans should not occur. If there is doubt in the mind of the reviewer, please do not close this topic, I would like to understand how it is not feeding.