ENT Gaming

Your Warcraft III username: seacow
Violator's Warcraft III username: RattatatDatAss @uswest
also on behalf of that lazy Juxtapoz greiving, seacow@useast alleged mh , "gamethrow = unpause"
[spoiler=]munch is tang[/spoiler]
Game name or map name: [ENT] Island Defense #13
Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=2181082
Rule player violated: activating of command, exp, froff and gc without vote {although the builder is winning game}
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): 12:32
Any further thoughts:
[spoiler=]the annoying mass pause/unpause is bannable?[/spoiler]

This seems like is is worthy of a ban. Usually when people need votes for decisions, they need more than 50% of the people playing to agree with them. Like for instance when red choses -AR, he needs a 60% agreement or else he may be banned.

G3tMadbro wrote:Usually when people need votes for decisions, they need more than 50% of the people playing to agree with them.

Always 60%*

Surely is worthy of a ban if the command activator doesn't get the people in the game to agree to atleast 60%. It just ruins the game for most people. He should of asked to use the command first even if the builders are winning and even at the end it changed nothing.

Banned one day for not starting a votekick.