[DOTA] DOTA: sweetd1ckmatty@useast, sweetd1ckwilly.@useast
Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2014 12:47 am
Your Warcraft III username: PKK-Haseo-
Violator's Warcraft III username: sweetd1ckmatty, sweetd1ckwilly
Game name or map name: dota arem
Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/replay/view_repla ... 832729.w3g
Rule player violated: Intentional throw/ruin (sweetd1ckmatty) , refuse to votekick (sweetd1ckwilly)
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): anything after 4 mins
Any further thoughts: this is just another example of same IP friends ruining a game. The MAJOR offenser was "sweetd1ckmatty", after giving up 1st blood, becomes irate and threatens to ruin game, he continues to rant and evntually begins to feed going 1-10. He also proceeds to buy mass irewood branches. A complete all-around a**hole.
The other player, sweetd1ckwilly, didnt particularly do anything to throw the game, but refused multiple times to kick his buddy for throwing the game (vote came down to 1 person several times). I dont really mind about the votekick, but blatent item destruction and throwing should be upheld, at least for a month or more if possible.
Violator's Warcraft III username: sweetd1ckmatty, sweetd1ckwilly
Game name or map name: dota arem
Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/replay/view_repla ... 832729.w3g
Rule player violated: Intentional throw/ruin (sweetd1ckmatty) , refuse to votekick (sweetd1ckwilly)
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): anything after 4 mins
Any further thoughts: this is just another example of same IP friends ruining a game. The MAJOR offenser was "sweetd1ckmatty", after giving up 1st blood, becomes irate and threatens to ruin game, he continues to rant and evntually begins to feed going 1-10. He also proceeds to buy mass irewood branches. A complete all-around a**hole.
The other player, sweetd1ckwilly, didnt particularly do anything to throw the game, but refused multiple times to kick his buddy for throwing the game (vote came down to 1 person several times). I dont really mind about the votekick, but blatent item destruction and throwing should be upheld, at least for a month or more if possible.