ENT Gaming

Game link (if known): http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 083003.w3g
Game name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #68
Your Warcraft III username: PrettyInPink
Violator's Warcraft III username: Kaskade
Rule player violated: Maphack
Time of violation (specify whether you are using in-game or replay time): There are so many instance. Two are blatant. The others skeptical. I wil emphasize the blatant ones.

7:08 - 7:32 / Sniper backs precisely when lina is closing in on him. He says mia was called but it never was.

(06:01 / All) QQ13itch: Chill out brosph
(06:19 / All) QQ13itch: I SAID CHILL
(06:26 / All) Kaskade: U hitting me
(06:30 / All) QQ13itch: =)
(06:51) LuBu_NaGa killed ubernubiestnoob
(07:07) Mexican_Wisp killed LuBu_NaGa
(07:29) ladela killed Reptarrrr
(07:30 / Allied) xXxVOLB3ATxXx: damn
(07:38 / Allied) xXxVOLB3ATxXx: he gets haste
(07:40 / All) QQ13itch: do u have wards out?
(07:41 / All) QQ13itch: Snipe?
(07:46 / All) Kaskade: they sai mIA
(07:47 / All) Kaskade: So
(07:58 / All) QQ13itch: not sure if i believe that 1
(08:00 / All) QQ13itch: lol i remember they said u mh

46:58 - 47:10 / Sniper calls "b" when hes had no vision of mirana ulting. as axe is approaching them sniper steps back. krob and pudge remain there.

^ THESE TWO ARE THE MOST BLATANT.

If you have time look at these too.

13:20 - 13:35 , 16:35 -16:50 , 20:25 - 20:30 , 23:45 - 24:07, 35:00 - 35:10
These are all instance where he backs at the perfect time. He is ungankable. Ive never seem him get ganked in all my games ive reviewed him. Map awareness is never %100 right.

Any further thoughts: Focus on first two timestamps.

reviewed replay and again as @aRt)Y said.. backing does no prove of MH guy.. what is your infatuation with Kaskade? if you keep loosing to him/her why keep playing with him/her if your going to complain about it? those 2 time stamps you provided just show good map awareness as your previous videos.. any thought @aRt)Y ? and why is it only you requesting a BAN for mh on this person? if he was really hacking wouldnt you think there would be more people submiting a request on this person?

As nabo said, he will review the case. Until then, we'll all wait.

07:06 I can see cm running towards river from bot lane, 07:12 dg's mid wave died except one last range creep, so backing so he wont get arrowed and keeping himself better positioned makes sense.

***07:24-07:31 sniper runs towards cm and he knows cm is there despite having no prior vision. Being careful and staying back makes sense since he could have had a glimpse of cm at 07:06 as noted, but reacting to or approaching towards something without prior vision/hint is quite suspicious.

(07:40 / All) QQ13itch: do u have wards out?
(07:41 / All) QQ13itch: Snipe?
(07:46 / All) Kaskade: they sai mIA
Not a strong evidence = but it is in fact a false claim.

13:00-13:30 instance map awareness? hmmm lets see. Ambiguous. Not a clear example of mh though.
14:03 why does sniper not kill drow? does not mean he dont mh though.
15:50 does not react by arrow. does not mean he dont mh though.
16:35-16:50 reasonable time to back off especially since opponent were previously near by.
20:25-20:35 reasonable time to back off after tping and clearing/pushing the wave when he is also half or less hp.
23:45 - 24:02 again, reasonable time to back off.
35:00 - 35:10 back off at reasonable time, but looks like he reacted to movement of gank = suspicious.
46:58 - 47:10 asking team to back off when close to opponent base and they are all mia and they have a mirana due to lack of vision as he stated is reasonable decision.

Throughout the game it is however suspicious that sniper had good map awareness and good hit on the real hero among images without using sharpel.

Not definite evidence.

Denied for now.