Page 1 of 1

[LTD] 32.beckham@useast.battle.net

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:43 pm
by Patti30
Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=5059099
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1100+ #45
Your Warcraft III Username: Patti30
Violator's Warcraft III Username: 32.beckham
Violated Rule(s): Game ruining
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Wave 5 and 8
Any further thoughts: He is at 1800 elo so no noob. He didnt upgrade lvl 5 to "just lose faster". Lvl 5 wasn't lost at all and we just needed one more heal since blue didn't upgrade. After that he send 3 commanders and dino lvl 8 but we already had enough commanders. I know this isn't bannable but with this context it just shows that he was trolling. Lvl 8 same thing was at 400 wood again and didn't upgrade.
(14:16 / Allied) 32.Beckham: lets jsut ff plz
(14:22 / Allied) 32.Beckham: we lose this
(14:44 / Allied) 32.Beckham: just lose
(14:58 / Allied) Patti30: up at least
(15:04 / Allied) 32.Beckham: just lose
(15:06 / Allied) 32.Beckham: faster
(15:09 / Allied) 32.Beckham: cant win thi
(15:10 / Allied) 32.Beckham: s
(15:33 / Allied) Patti30: 300 wood blue
(15:45 / Allied) Patti30: its not your decision to give up the game
(15:50 / Allied) 32.Beckham: shut up
(15:51 / Allied) 32.Beckham: noob
(18:26 / Allied) 32.Beckham: go report
(18:28 / Allied) 32.Beckham: big noob
(18:30 / Allied) Patti30: I will
(18:44 / Allied) Patti30: 400 wood again not upgrading

He was talking frensh after that and I don't understand that^^

Re: [LTD] 32.beckham@useast.battle.net

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:52 pm
by MichaelSong
@Patti30
As you mentioned,
"know this isn't bannable but with this context it just shows that he was trolling."

You know the reason this would not be accepted most likely.
This is not the place where you post to blame player he seemed to be noob.
( + I do not think 32.Beckham is less skilled legion player, he is vouched in LIHL as well. and in my experience, he is decent player. )

In my opinion, this would be most likely denied. Thank you.

Re: [LTD] 32.beckham@useast.battle.net

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:54 pm
by Patti30
I said sending dino lvl 8 isnt bannable the rest he did defiantly is.
( + I do not think 32.Beckham is less skilled legion player, he is vouched in LIHL as well. and in my experience, he is decent player. )

I believe this got nothing to do here.
Or is there some reason lihl players cant ruin games?

This is not the place where you post to blame player he seemed to be noob.

I dont believe he is a noob I just believe he wanted us to loose fast to start a new game. He even said that in chat.

Re: [LTD] 32.beckham@useast.battle.net

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:42 pm
by SLSGuennter
@wolfwarrior this indeed is banable, as sry as iam for the good old beckham ... he did say "lets just ff pls" and wanted to lose and then refuses to upgrade king. so yes this is considered game ruin and imo and he should get banned. he isnt allowed to decide "its lost" for the team. it is same like intentionally not healing or something.

Re: [LTD] 32.beckham@useast.battle.net

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 3:42 pm
by bboypop
idc about ban. u can ban its not my life.

patti u big noob why u give advices. i did not up because i was talkin to u.
im a big noob i cant talk and up. or explain me how plz

edit : guennter its cool u say it in front everyone and not sayin some things in my back for once

Re: [LTD] 32.beckham@useast.battle.net

Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 7:34 pm
by matdas
why the hate? you joined to play, so play. don't give up when your mates want to continue.
banned 2 days for team killing. aka refusing to upgrade king when the king needed it.

come on, you should know better....