[RISK DEVO] whitemaster@uswest.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

alf321
Resource Storage
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:45 pm

[RISK DEVO] whitemaster@uswest.battle.net

Postby alf321 » Sun Mar 22, 2015 9:16 am

[b]Replay Link:[http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=5471289.w3g]
[b]Game Name:[[ent] risk devolution #41]
[b]Your Warcraft III Username:[alf321]
[b]Violator's Warcraft III Username:[whitemaster]
[b]Violated Rule(s):[insults and "-stfu" abuse]
[b]Time of Violation (in-game or replay):[for insults : 10min , 13min, 14min 30, 15min 30, 16min 50, 19min 50, 22min 10 ... etc and for "stfu" abuse : 14min, 16min, 19min 20, 22min 30 ]
[b]Any further thoughts:[whitemaster (teal in this game) and I (grey in this game). He insulted me many times i never said any insult but this guy to annoy me "stfu" me many times without any reason. This made me in an embarasing situation cause i needed to talk to players to play at that moment. I hope you ll ban this guy because that kind of behaviour is very frequent and just spoil game. Could "stfu abuse" be a rules for you ? It was consider as a thing forbidden by the creator. Thx]

User avatar
MichaelSong
Treant
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:52 pm
Location: Korea
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Re: [RISK DEVO] whitemaster@uswest.battle.net

Postby MichaelSong » Sun Mar 29, 2015 5:57 am

Reviewing.
“He who is not contented with what he has, would not be contented with what he would like to have.” - Socrates

User avatar
MichaelSong
Treant
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:52 pm
Location: Korea
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Re: [RISK DEVO] whitemaster@uswest.battle.net

Postby MichaelSong » Sun Mar 29, 2015 9:09 am

alf321 wrote:This made me in an embarasing situation cause i needed to talk to players to play at that moment.

Why did you need to talk to players? I don't see any communication needed since the game was FFA.

I do see flame in-game but we barely ban players for flame. You should have better !ignore him or squelch him.

!Denied
“He who is not contented with what he has, would not be contented with what he would like to have.” - Socrates


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests