ENT Gaming

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/replay.php?id=5906791
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #96
Your Warcraft III Username: akitos@useast.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: 1[ b ]g@europe.battle.net (without spaces)
Violated Rule(s): Refusing to cooperate when asked to do so several times by sending alone and not save-send with teammates to win.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): LvL 14, don't know time sorry.
Any further thoughts: He pretty much solo played all game, ignoring any advice and doing shit like building 5x engineer for lvl 3 even tho they had just sent 2 and he could've undervalue.. At lvl 14 he decided to solo send without saying anything, forcing us to send 14, which failed. At lvl 17 we ended up dieing only because he took king and did terrible control, leaving low hp demon up for ages and ignoring locks; we could've EASILY survived there. So yeah, he killed the team and made us loose on his own.

EDIT: God.lik3 just told me that gsauce & permomentus, who were also in the game, have used antistuck for other purpose than stucked creeps, so they should be banned aswell.

i just registed and am obviously not in position to making decisions, but i wanted to chime in anyway. watched the replay, it looked like red was giving orders to his teammates which they not always chose to follow. your basis for the request seem to be "player is stubborn". now if that's a reason to get banned i will think twice before playing an ENT game next time..

show me the proof or are you just being a child and pointing fingers at everyone cause you lost?

Juraviel wrote:i just registed and am obviously not in position to making decisions, but i wanted to chime in anyway. watched the replay, it looked like red was giving orders to his teammates which they not always chose to follow. your basis for the request seem to be "player is stubborn". now if that's a reason to get banned i will think twice before playing an ENT game next time..

It's purely about his solo send @ lvl 14 and that's against the rules and definitly not just "player is stubborn". He did send solo without any communication with his team, forcing us as a team to send at a level that the majority did not agree with + even if we did, we didn't have the chance to do so, because he just decided without saying anything; and that's what i'm acusing him of. The rest was just me being mad, but it ain't subject of this ban request.

gsauce wrote:show me the proof or are you just being a child and pointing fingers at everyone cause you lost?

I didn't see any of that because i was on the opposit team, nor did i check it myself. If you'd be capable of reading you would've noticed that i started that God.lik3 told me that after the game, later on i was told the same by Wolke. So all i did was asking the mod to have a loot at it while they're going to check the replay anyway.

Do you really think the game would be won if not for that singular move he did? No other player on your team made any moves that lead to that result? I respectfully disagree. Bad plays are hardly a reason for account suspension (i get it out on others during the game ), so does the fact he wouldn't say what he was gonna do. I guess if there's a mention in the rules.. that a player who makes an independent decision merits banning, then i suppose you got me there. Simply odd to me though

Not that i have any say in the matter, i just felt like joining the discussion.

ps
you leaked nearly as much as him, but what do i know (not a legion td pro myself).

Juraviel wrote:Do you really think the game would be won if not for that singular move he did? No other player on your team made any moves that lead to that result? I respectfully disagree. Bad plays are hardly a reason for account suspension (i get it out on others during the game ), so does the fact he wouldn't say what he was gonna do. I guess if there's a mention in the rules.. that a player who makes an independent decision merits banning, then i suppose you got me there. Simply odd to me though

Not that i have any say in the matter, i just felt like joining the discussion.

ps
you leaked nearly as much as him, but what do i know (not a legion td pro myself).

There is a rule like this which you would know if you had read my ban request, or the rules themselve, carefully.

"Refusing to cooperate when asked to do so several times by sending alone and not save-send with teammates to win. "

And yes, if we went for straight 17, we would've won. And no, no other teammate made any moves that lead to that result, HE forced us to send 14 by sending solo without talking about it first. It's not about bad plays here, it's about not teamplaying, and yes, that is a ban reason in this game. You simply are not supposed to send whenever you feel like without having a chat about it with your team; if the majority disagrees with your decicion you can't force it on them, and in his case, he didn't even give us a chance to disagree.

this was an extremly bad communication ...
purp asked to send 14, teal said they wont die, red said he wants to wait what enemy do, blue wants to send 14.
nobody rly says something like: dont 14 pls.
w/e
blue did send 14 without getting the ok by team before (and teal + red seemed to be against it, while purp was on "no-care-mode")
1[b]g@europe banned 36 for refusing to cooperate

permomentus@useast did antistuck (first game on 1,2k+, but didnt stop even after he got told its banable) 1 day warning banned.
Luna_7@asia (not the first time he got reported due to as-things) 3 days banned.