[ltd] asdat0r@europe.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

driksdijah
Armored Tree
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:26 pm

[ltd] asdat0r@europe.battle.net

Postby driksdijah » Fri Jul 31, 2015 3:36 pm

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 234485.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #77
Your Warcraft III Username: driksdijah@useast.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: asdat0r@europe.battle.net king23@useast.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Game Ruining for purple : asdat0r@europe.battle.net and wont kick a troll,game ruiner player for king23@useast.battle.net
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): all the game is
Any further thoughts:
purple wont build all level, leak all time, wont send one time in team , in 17 level he send 2 time, i have think he is afk but he wont he just troll.
we have to play 3v4 and we loose only by purple fault on level 17 with hard leak.
game ruining for real.

enemie team no fair and wont kick purple.
Attachments
6234485.w3g
[ENT] Legion TD Mega #77
(1.17 MiB) Downloaded 26 times

User avatar
HazarDous
Staff Department
Posts: 9051
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:36 pm
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 227 times

Re: [ltd] asdat0r@europe.battle.net

Postby HazarDous » Sun Aug 02, 2015 5:11 am

After reviewing; asdat0r@useast has never gone afk unless you consider level 2 to which he did not build. He is a new LTD player and had build a tier 6 unit for level 1. I'm ready to give him the benefit of the doubt and believe he never went afk. He probably thought Magnator could hold level 2.

(04:06 / Allied) driksdijah: omg
(04:09 / Allied) driksdijah: purple afk ?
(04:20 / Allied) driksdijah: !votekick asda
(04:22 / All) driksdijah: purple afk
(04:29 / All) driksdijah: kick
(04:33 / All) asdat0r: me?
(04:42 / All) driksdijah: he wont build
(04:45 / All) asdat0r: u can suck my afk dick

However, you votekicked him as he was was building/answering. You also pushed the other team into kicking him with false statements. This is bannable.


Spoiler!
(04:20 / Allied) driksdijah: !votekick asda
(04:30 / All) Gnurf: Player [GoToHellAndDie] voted to kick player [asdat0r]. 4 more votes are needed to pass.
(04:33 / All) Gnurf: Player [Gnurf] voted to kick player [asdat0r]. 3 more votes are needed to pass.
(04:35 / All) Gnurf: Player [catice] voted to kick player [asdat0r]. 2 more votes are needed to pass.
(04:39 / Allied) KinG23: !no
(05:00 / All) Gnurf: Player [gerechteficker] voted to kick player [asdat0r]. 1 more votes are needed to pass.

Votekicker:
driksdijah@useast

Players who voted while knowing purple was not afk (his team)
gnurf@europe
gerechteficker@europe

Players who voted without knowing purple wasn't really afk:
catice@asia
gotohellanddie@europe

Player who did not vote:
valm[o]nt@useast
king23@useast



Sure you could have misinterpreted his ''afk'' with the no build on level 2, but you tried to votekick him again multiple times while he was building.

(06:24 / Allied) driksdijah: !votekick asda (Same players voted)

(09:04 / Allied) driksdijah: !votekick asda (No one voted)

(10:28 / All) driksdijah: no kick troll or afk = 50 % so you take 1.5 day ban (He was clearly playing and building when you said that)

(13:11 / Allied) driksdijah: !votekick asda (No one voted)

Votekicking someone new to the game is not acceptable. Try helping them instead, and if you're not willing to do that, you can either not votekick them, or go play LTD 1200+.

Mercy

Re: [ltd] asdat0r@europe.battle.net

Postby Mercy » Mon Aug 03, 2015 7:51 am

As Hazard stated, the VK was started when he had been building. Also, the VK you started is a bannable one. He wasn't a troll, just a new player, has only roughly 73ish games- not nearly enough to learn the game if you don't pay attention.. You didn't even try to help him play.

If someone ban request you for this, you would be banned.

If a request comes in for him again, then we'll see, but this is just toxicity from you as you didn't even try to teach him. Instead you flame and try to force a kick when it was unwarranted.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests