ENT Gaming

greatalexander@uswest.battle.net, ktar@europe.battle.net, xarix@server.eurobattle.net: requesting a ban
Postby eloocd » Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:52 pm

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 486848.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Burbenog TD #65
Your Warcraft III Username: emergeextempore@useast.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: greatalexander@uswest.battle.net, ktar@europe.battle.net, xarix@server.eurobattle.net
Violated Rule(s): game ruining, refusing to votekick a game-ruiner, flaming/hate speech/offensive language
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): all times noted for abuse are based off the replay time clock not in-game time. 0:14:20 (xarix; language ["fuckin asshole"]), 0:15:09 (greatalexander; language ["STFU BITCH"]), 15:45 (greatalexander; language ["horrible spot retard"]), 0:16:00 (xarix, language ["horrible afk dickhead"]), 0:16:16 (greatalexander, language ["suck a dick bitch"]), 0:20:50 (xarix; game ruining [builds in blue's base interfering with good, potentially necessary build locations permanently on his side for the rest of the game]), 0:24:40 (greatalexander, game ruining [builds in purple's base interfering with good, potentially necessary build locations permanently on that side of the map for the rest of the game], I'm getting a panic attack so i'll shorten this report by adding that
greatalexander sold all his towers to ruin the game
ktar refused 2x to votekick greatalexander after he sold all of his towers to ruin the game, which actually contributed to the game being ruined further
xarix continued to have a flame war with greatalexander calling him a faggot and gay.
this game almost gave me a heart attack from stress and i really don't think you want ppl like this on your servers.
Any further thoughts: keep people like this in check by banning them for the rules they violated, and off of your servers for a while.

can somebody tell me the status of this post as per moderation goes?

Why is this post receiving no attention but the DotA and LTD posts are?

are you kidding me. i posted this 3 days ago and dozens of posts have been addressed before me. fix your system i say.

Most of the moderation staff performs outside duties and not many of them are as familiar with Burbenog TD. Patience is necessary and it will be handled in time.

Owl wrote:Most of the moderation staff performs outside duties and not many of them are as familiar with Burbenog TD. Patience is necessary and it will be handled in time.

thank you. thank you for showing this post attention, i'm willing to wait however long is needed. i'll check back in a few days.

just checking in, no action was taken yet as to my knowledge. the offense is clear and plain, just want some closure from the staff.

hey thanks i think i don't care anymore. pls don't pay any more attention to this post/thread.

Just because your request hasn't been processed yet doesn't mean we aren't paying attention- there is a lack of moderators with Burb TD knowledge.

Let's start with Alexander etc

Flaming is not something we ban for if the commands are not used - or at least that is the recommendation.

HOWEVER - Game ruining by selling towers, building without consent, and overall grieving ARE things that moderators ban for. I recommend patience, action will be taken.

My other recommendation is that gaming should be a relaxing experience. If the flaming continues, use squelch and regularly check game chat to check for any sort of chat that follows that relates to teamplay- it is up for the player that is being flamed to use the ignore command and/or squelch commands to avoid further drama and if the hateful speech continues, I would have, as a moderator, would have issued a ban for flaming- but in this case, it's up to who reviews it if he or she will issue a ban for flaming.

I am sorry it has taken so long for someone to review this.

greatalexander banned 6d - 1d for flaming (instigation, etc), and 5d for selling towers
ktar banned 2d for not vk'ing alexander.

like I said, usage of ignore/squelch is recommended- I personally recommend squelch so you can at least see If pertinent information is shared regarding teamwork.

User appealed, no dodge.

Processing