Your Warcraft III username: get-crackin @ useast.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III username: everyone who voted in kick
Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #59
Approximate date/time of game (alternatively, link to a Stats page): time votekick is approved
Rule player violated: abuse kick
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): uncertain
Any further thoughts: i was votekicked for trying to help the team. i died defending bot against a lvl 17 nightseer and these guys decided to votekick me because of my performance. i never intentionally fed anyone on the scourge team i was out leveled adn out performed so before i was actually kicked they said it was evident i was feeding when i tried to defend the bottom tower from creeps unknowing that nightseer was hiding around the area. after this happened to agree with the team since i was supposedly feeding i didn't want to defend top rax in thought that i might die again and they would continue complaining. i feel nothing i did in this game was in violation of the rules besides try to help the team and farm which is legal. all the players in my opionion that voted to kick me violated the intentions of the votekick option and i was told in a previous BRQ that it is against the rules to votekick a player for being a noob, or being out performed so i feel all the players that voted to kick me should receive a ban for abuse kick. if this isnt the case then there is a very unclear description of votekick abuse and the BRQ for it should be removed.
multiple players in abuse kick
Moderator: ENT Staff
Re: multiple players in abuse kick
Please explain this situation.
Why didn't you defend top tier 3 tower when you refused to join your team in the team clash at btm tier 2 tower?
Edit : And you stood at the World Tree doing nothing for almost a minute. That was the moment all the players agreed and vote kicked you out of the game.
[spoiler=] [/spoiler]
Why didn't you defend top tier 3 tower when you refused to join your team in the team clash at btm tier 2 tower?
Edit : And you stood at the World Tree doing nothing for almost a minute. That was the moment all the players agreed and vote kicked you out of the game.
[spoiler=] [/spoiler]
Re: multiple players in abuse kick
Imo playing defensively shouldn't be kickable... If you spend the whole game farming forest instead of team ganking, should you be kicked? No IMO.
Re: multiple players in abuse kick
QTriNitY wrote:Please explain this situation.
Why didn't you defend top tier 3 tower when you refused to join your team in the team clash at btm tier 2 tower?
Edit : And you stood at the World Tree doing nothing for almost a minute. That was the moment all the players agreed and vote kicked you out of the game.
[spoiler=] [/spoiler]
y didn't i? because when i was defending the bot TIER 2 tower from creeps cuz it was getting pushed and died to a hidden NS who came from behing the tower & i was told "it's evident intentional feeding" so if im defending the bot tower from a HIDDEN NS and it's intentional feeding what do u think their reply or comment/justification would b if i died to a SK defending the top tier 3 tower? INTENTIONAL FEEDING
Re: multiple players in abuse kick
Intentional suicide is when a player gets himself killed without an objective in mind.
I noticed you were afk creeping neutrals earlier on when the initial vote happened. For this, your ally Thinker sided with you that the votekick attempt was baseless.
However, the instance depicted above told me that you deserved to be voted off as you afk stood by world tree.
I am leaving this request open to Nutz or other Admins for final review because the verdict has major impact on all 9 players in this game.
I noticed you were afk creeping neutrals earlier on when the initial vote happened. For this, your ally Thinker sided with you that the votekick attempt was baseless.
However, the instance depicted above told me that you deserved to be voted off as you afk stood by world tree.
I am leaving this request open to Nutz or other Admins for final review because the verdict has major impact on all 9 players in this game.
- NutzSucksHard
- Plague Treant
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:56 pm
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: multiple players in abuse kick
(18:20 / Allied) ghostcaptain3: !votekick get
(18:22 / All) KickAssDota: definitely worth every try
(18:25 / Allied) KickAssDota: !yes
(25:04 / Allied) KickAssDota: !votekick get-
I'am not banning everyone. Only the two that really wanted you out. Reason is that banning everyone is wrong, cause people thought they were doing the good thing for sentinel. In a certain way, you also 'abused' it. By trying to kick OJ.
I'am banning only both user for 2 days cause it wasn't a such bad offense. Yes it kinda pissed you, still, you didn't acted to have them on your side.
User ghostcaptain3@asia.battle.net and kickassdota@useast.battle.net are banned for '2 Days'. Reason : 'Minor Offense'.
@Qtrin, it's not the user who decide who is banned but you. So it's not cause he's asking all that voted that you have too. Do what you fill is the best.
Thanks for reporting. Moving to process.
(18:22 / All) KickAssDota: definitely worth every try
(18:25 / Allied) KickAssDota: !yes
(25:04 / Allied) KickAssDota: !votekick get-
I'am not banning everyone. Only the two that really wanted you out. Reason is that banning everyone is wrong, cause people thought they were doing the good thing for sentinel. In a certain way, you also 'abused' it. By trying to kick OJ.
I'am banning only both user for 2 days cause it wasn't a such bad offense. Yes it kinda pissed you, still, you didn't acted to have them on your side.
User ghostcaptain3@asia.battle.net and kickassdota@useast.battle.net are banned for '2 Days'. Reason : 'Minor Offense'.
@Qtrin, it's not the user who decide who is banned but you. So it's not cause he's asking all that voted that you have too. Do what you fill is the best.
Thanks for reporting. Moving to process.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests