arcadianwarrior sw_sustainer europe

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

draccoloco
Aura Tree
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:12 pm

arcadianwarrior sw_sustainer europe

Postby draccoloco » Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:52 am

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=7185965
Game Name: [ENT] Risk Devolution #70
Your Warcraft III Username: jml18
Violator's Warcraft III Username: arcadianwarrior and sw_sustainer
Violated Rule(s): preteaming
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts: sw_sustainer Went straight for the reamining big fellow red when his premade when striaght to finish of the reamining smal guys (yellow- darkgreen) after being accused for preteaming he spared darkgreen and contniue with yellow) useing all the Money in his bank to kill a player far far away from his main lands in a russian city that was cut by 3 difrent players. He contniue to use gold on yellow insted of helping darkgreen and red who were strugeling with oranage. To not finish the game after finishing of yellow he then Cuts oranage just alitle so he wouldent reach the 100 income so that the cud continue killing of red who were still the threat. evrey time oranage reached the crise number 100 green just cut 1 or 2 countrys so that he cud contniue killing of red. Once red was gone and drakgreen was also almost dead. The both preteamers clashed on to eachother trolling alitle at the begning massing general horses on the middle east. But then go on much more seriouce. The fact that green helped oj to finish of red befor red left and the fact that he just cut oj just alitle to keep the pressure on red was enough proves that they were preteaming. no cumincation betwin them. No self defence in Words to other players it was nothing that normaly a normal player would do when being accused for prteaming. IT was pure silince.

Hatedmaru

Re: arcadianwarrior sw_sustainer europe

Postby Hatedmaru » Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:31 am

@draccoloco

http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... ng:RDRules

The following are fully acceptable:
Pre-Teaming


Processing


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests