[DOTA] IlllIllIl1, USEast / Bart(NL), Europe / waterFlow, USWest

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

User avatar
SoJ
Resource Storage
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 5:32 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

[DOTA] IlllIllIl1, USEast / Bart(NL), Europe / waterFlow, USWest

Postby SoJ » Thu May 12, 2016 10:01 am

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 716521.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #77
Your Warcraft III Username: Stone-of-Jordan
Violator's Warcraft III Username: IlllIllIl1, Bart(NL), waterFlow
Violated Rule(s):

  • IlllIllIl1 (Sniper) exploits courier glitch after spotting Bart(NL) (Techies) in bot river @ -1:43 and immediately moves courier to walk over three mines @ -0:58
  • Bart(NL) (Techies) griefs at fountain about exploit, declares AFK @ 2:10 after failed draw vote, and refuses to play until 17:00
  • waterFlow (Nightstalker) rage quits @ 7:08 after failed draw vote and his own death
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): -1:43, -0:58, 2:10-17:00, 7:08
Any further thoughts:
- Techies refused to explain any part of his grievance (first time I've seen the glitch firsthand), but he definitely overreacted; instead of choosing to play on and let ENT handle the ban, he griefed incoherently for 15 minutes and threw our game
- Multiple failed votekick attempts for techies from 3:42 to 20:00. Strangely, he stayed at his keyboard instead of leaving.

I may have made a mistake in chat. At 4:43, I said that not votekicking a game thrower was bannable. Looking at the rules now, it doesn't seem explicitly bannable; I guess it's a judgment call? In any case, I didn't intend to deceive players about the rules. Could you clear this up for me so that in the future I know how to respond better?

User avatar
pearson
Armored Tree
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: [DOTA] IlllIllIl1, USEast / Bart(NL), Europe / waterFlow, USWest

Postby pearson » Thu May 12, 2016 12:59 pm

@Soj

IlllIllIl1 (Sniper) + Bart(NL) (Techies) are valid ban requests.

waterFlow (Nightstalker) has left the game. Leavers are auto banned by autobanex not moderators.


Votekick rules are explained here: http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... ng:VKRules


And in the mentioned game, techies announced to everyone that he isn't playing the game, which is against the rules. Therefore votekick is obligatory as mentioned here:

* If a votekick is initiated to kick a visible game ruiner, all players are obligated to !yes.
" Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. " -Abraham Lincoln

BeerLord
Protector of Nature
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: [DOTA] IlllIllIl1, USEast / Bart(NL), Europe / waterFlow, USWest

Postby BeerLord » Thu May 12, 2016 2:57 pm

@SoJ yes not votekicking a clear game ruiner is against ENT rules.
Bart(nl) with two previous bans for game ruin. Banned 10 days for game ruin, third offense.
https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=78080
https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=59710
Waterflow's leaving handled by autoban.
IlllIllIl1, and LASTRIFLEMAN banned 2 days each for failure to vote-kick game ruiner.
edit IlllIllIl1 banned 5 days for exploiting glitch, using courier to kill mines.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests