Page 1 of 1

[LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 7:36 pm
by Hoebell
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 062847.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #20
Your Warcraft III Username: MadFU.CKMan
Violator's Warcraft III Username: sorcixo
Violated Rule(s): Insaulting and Flaming teamguys
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts:

(04:57 / Allied) SorciXo: give king
(04:58 / Allied) bmwM3: -.-
(04:58 / Allied) Permanent: :D
(04:58 / Allied) SorciXo: u bad

(10:59 / Allied) SorciXo: get
(11:01 / Allied) SorciXo: off kinbg
(11:04 / Allied) SorciXo: u fucking bad

(14:33 / Allied) SorciXo: look at this shit
14:45 / Allied) SorciXo: dude u fucking suck

(18:15 / Allied) SorciXo: so stfu
(18:18 / Allied) SorciXo: well
(18:20 / Allied) SorciXo: then u all suck

21:15 / Allied) SorciXo: new acc noobs
(21:26 / Allied) SorciXo: l2p noobs

21:32 / Allied) SorciXo: l2p noob


He alltime flammed and insault full team, i didnt copy and pasted all... its a short outcut of his fullflame!

This guy is toxic like shit, thats why nobody want to play with him.. out team decide to !ff this game for manners, cuze the other team played 3vs4... its an teamdecide nothing else..

Ban this guy for international FLAMING

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 7:38 pm
by Hoebell
I stayed cool and dont flammed back !

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:31 pm
by SLSGuennter
@Hoebell
1.: Pls edit ur post instead of making 2 in a row with just 2 min between them!

2.: Seems like thats the wrong gamelink? I dont see a "SorciXo" in that game?

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:32 pm
by Hoebell
Ur right, thats the right gamelink

http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 062766.w3g


The argument "use !ignore" didnt work... cuze he flammed full team... if we use the !ignorefunction we cant play inteam... anyone of our team have to see the flames of this guy...

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:50 pm
by LetMeHelpYou
Hoebell wrote:I stayed cool and dont flammed back !



After going through the entire chat ,

i dont see any flame by SorciXo ( not excessive for sure )
But a lot of flame from MadFU.CKMan

this request has no meaning at all in my opinion
and also MadFU.CKMan should be warned for excessive flame

Spoiler!
(10:02 / Allied) MadFU.CKMan: pussy
(18:32 / Allied) MadFU.CKMan: XD
(18:34 / Allied) MadFU.CKMan: u carry
(18:35 / Allied) MadFU.CKMan: my COCK
(18:38 / Allied) MadFU.CKMan: deep
(18:41 / Allied) MadFU.CKMan: in ur small asholde
(18:50 / All) MadFU.CKMan: !ff
(21:20 / Allied) MadFU.CKMan: u fucking MTOHERFUCKER



Spoiler!
(14:45 / Allied) SorciXo: dude u fucking suck

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:55 pm
by Hoebell
i said 1x time fuck u nothing else... who are u... what u do is just "SHITTALK"

U should wrote ur own Appeals or Request and dont spamm others...


and BTW if u dont see flames of the other guys u maybe need glasses!

I copy pasted a shotcut of there flame its COPIED!

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:59 pm
by LetMeHelpYou
Why are you flaming me ? xD
I am just giving my input on your ban request
I have nothing to do with this game and nothing against you

I still stand by what i said
peace :)

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:01 pm
by Hoebell
I flamed u ? where i flammed... copy and paste it, let me show..

I think u should go to work or do something else.. would be better for you..
bye

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:13 pm
by LetMeHelpYou
@Hoebell

who are u... what u do is just "SHITTALK"
u maybe need glasses!

this is how you respond to me (very negative)

i said 1x time fuck u nothing else

Not True , as u can read in above spoiler


if you want my advice >
personal attacks on forum wont help you in anyway !
you should look back and think about your actions in that game :)

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:24 pm
by Jabba41
Locked.

@Hoebell Giving input on a banrequest in the way he did isnt considered spamming.

Re: [LTD] Ban sorcixo

Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:44 pm
by Jabba41
No excessive flaming, actually your flame was worse then his.

Denied.