[LTD] burgertrolle@uswest.battle.net (+enemy team)
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 1:51 pm
Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 097796.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #2
Your Warcraft III Username: baem
Violator's Warcraft III Username: burgertrolle@uswest.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): game ruining: afk
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): ~ minute 36, didnt send at 17 for 18 then like we planned long ago and didnt came back
Any further thoughts: We all tried to votekick him, but the enemy team refused to votekick even after they got our low send at the start of wave 18 and they claimed not to have any proof that hes afk. Then he leaked wave 19 ofc, and they kicked him after 19. Now they had time to send a double demon for wave 20 and this was the end. Ofc this is votekick abuse ("If a votekick is initiated to kick a visible game ruiner, all players are obligated to !yes"). I guess you argue that they didnt agree to the votekick too late. I dont think so, i would atleast warn them.
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #2
Your Warcraft III Username: baem
Violator's Warcraft III Username: burgertrolle@uswest.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): game ruining: afk
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): ~ minute 36, didnt send at 17 for 18 then like we planned long ago and didnt came back
Any further thoughts: We all tried to votekick him, but the enemy team refused to votekick even after they got our low send at the start of wave 18 and they claimed not to have any proof that hes afk. Then he leaked wave 19 ofc, and they kicked him after 19. Now they had time to send a double demon for wave 20 and this was the end. Ofc this is votekick abuse ("If a votekick is initiated to kick a visible game ruiner, all players are obligated to !yes"). I guess you argue that they didnt agree to the votekick too late. I dont think so, i would atleast warn them.