I got a message from admin says i can create another topic and ask for another mod review u cant say this topic is processed in another topic read here the message i got
Reason: The reported message does not fit into any other category, please use the further information field. Complaint should be a last resort option. Try to ask the mod via PM, and then re-post your ban request asking for a second moderator to review if you are unhappy with his decision..
U cant do that jabba
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 2:35 pm
Re: U cant do that jabba
And im talking about the post u moved to processed section named [dota] sven feeder so return the post to this section so another mod can review sven fed his first kill and got away with it
- AngelMayCRYXIV
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 12:26 pm
- Location: Rome
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: U cant do that jabba
2 reviews have been made so far from beerlord and hyo, what else do u want? To ban sven as it is your purpose? No, they analyzed it and there was no feeding purposely. If you are not happy about the second review, you should open a complaint and not a third topic regarding the same thing altho im sure it will get denied. Dont waste your time and bear with it.
Respect Others If You Want To Be Respected. Think what you did to other people first, instead of pointing your fingers to other people. Don't be such a selfish hypocrite. "So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets."
Re: U cant do that jabba
Beerlord reviewed and denied it the first time, and when u reposted, i took the time as well to review and fully agree with beerlord decision: Sven didnt fed or game ruined at all
Hardly believe ull get a different opinion After 2 reviews which strongly contradicts urs.
EDIT: You seem to be holding on to his 1st death, which can be considered feeding: Yes as i stated in the previous review, sven did end up feeding on the 1st death, however:
[*]It was 1 time only, so your idea of "So im allowed to feed a couple of deaths is okay" is wrong - we're talking of 1 death, and 1 death only, not 3-4+
[*] Considering how he played the rest of the game, it's obvious hes not a game ruiner, neither was he trying to lose
So:
If sven fed on his 1st death? Sure he did;
If he did it intentionally? Yes he did, to prove that furion was purposely trying to ruin the game
If he should have done it? Definitely not - 2 wrongs don't make 1 right, so he shoulnd't have dived the tower and died to prove furion was a game ruiner
If he should be banned based on this 1 death only? In my honest opinion, no. While it's wrong to do what he did, it was a 1 time incident, and considering all the evidence (Furion/meepo are 2 chronic players who multibox/mh/dodge; He played fine till the end of the game, he helped his team, etc), this death dind't have a major impact, and most certainly he should not be banned based on a 1 incident, due to the reasons mentioned before.
Hardly believe ull get a different opinion After 2 reviews which strongly contradicts urs.
EDIT: You seem to be holding on to his 1st death, which can be considered feeding: Yes as i stated in the previous review, sven did end up feeding on the 1st death, however:
[*]It was 1 time only, so your idea of "So im allowed to feed a couple of deaths is okay" is wrong - we're talking of 1 death, and 1 death only, not 3-4+
[*] Considering how he played the rest of the game, it's obvious hes not a game ruiner, neither was he trying to lose
So:
If sven fed on his 1st death? Sure he did;
If he did it intentionally? Yes he did, to prove that furion was purposely trying to ruin the game
If he should have done it? Definitely not - 2 wrongs don't make 1 right, so he shoulnd't have dived the tower and died to prove furion was a game ruiner
If he should be banned based on this 1 death only? In my honest opinion, no. While it's wrong to do what he did, it was a 1 time incident, and considering all the evidence (Furion/meepo are 2 chronic players who multibox/mh/dodge; He played fine till the end of the game, he helped his team, etc), this death dind't have a major impact, and most certainly he should not be banned based on a 1 incident, due to the reasons mentioned before.
- Jabba41
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 7435
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:56 pm
- Location: Germany - Hannover
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: U cant do that jabba
@MutantX1211 My bad, I missread something.
I reviewed the game now and:
This guy wasnt feeding intentionaly, if you "feed" by dying just because youre not super good then you wont get banned.
When he died at tower with furion together it can be considered intentional. But seeing this player has a clear history i dont see a reason to ban him here as he played fine after this.
Youre second review on this is thereby denied too.
I reviewed the game now and:
This guy wasnt feeding intentionaly, if you "feed" by dying just because youre not super good then you wont get banned.
When he died at tower with furion together it can be considered intentional. But seeing this player has a clear history i dont see a reason to ban him here as he played fine after this.
Youre second review on this is thereby denied too.
Send me your best Sloth pictures for instant unban*
*individual results may vary
*individual results may vary
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests