Evil_Nero@uswest.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

izanagi_izanami
Basic Tree
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 11:15 am

Evil_Nero@uswest.battle.net

Postby izanagi_izanami » Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:49 pm

Your Warcraft III username: Retsu_Unohana
Violator's Warcraft III username: Evil_Nero
Game name or map name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #1
Approximate date/time of game (alternatively, link to a Stats page): 08/06/2013, 16:24
Rule player violated: Possible Maphacking
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): 09:35 , 30:xx
Any further thoughts:

The 09:35 is 50/50. It might be that he could see tidehunter having the illusion rune but chances are he may not. Previously he retrieved the invisible as if he knew it was there. "There were no wards the whole game". Multiple Runaways from being ganked without wards can be meant to play safe but not all the time it is honest.

The 30:xx time is when Bounty Hunter (me) came from the bottom lane with the Invisible Rune which he did not see because he did not have wards. Once I got to the battlefield, he activated the Dust without much hassle.

His reply to the comment was the team being noob for telling him he is hacking.
Attachments
Evil_Nero_Map_Hack_30mins.w3g
(460.18 KiB) Downloaded 25 times

TinyKariboo
Forest Walker
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 8:37 am

Re: Evil_Nero@uswest.battle.net

Postby TinyKariboo » Sun Jun 09, 2013 10:13 pm

min 5:50 clock activate battery assoult without have any vision of slardar the second before he meet him

the 9:35 rune event he didn't see tide going there but he may have wanted to go there too , and hooked with vision of tide

14:03 the a clear 1v1 between tide and wl but he wait ..without fogclick you see husk and storm coming ot help tide.

20:57 pretty accurate hook without vision , but here can be a guess

min 23- 24 he may have guessed they come for him in socurge forest , but he was farming quietly as long as they did n't approach

the dust is also pretty "strange" .

No fogclcik though .

But I'm also pretty sure he MH.

I won't ban him tilll another admin review it , cos without fogclicks I 'll need another opinion, but I'm prety sure he mh.

User avatar
QTriNitY
Donator
Posts: 1773
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:05 pm

Re: Evil_Nero@uswest.battle.net

Postby QTriNitY » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:54 am

Banning without Fog Clicks confirmed by myself and Tinyk. Moving to Processed.

evil_nero@uswest.battle.net is banned for Map Hacking - 1 year

All Incidents in Game Time

5:51 - Pre activated Battery Assault prior vision of Target.
Usage of Skill prior Target's existence.
[spoiler=]Image
Image
Image
Image[/spoiler]
9:22 - Left an untouched creep wave after mid enemy heroes had retreated. Proceeded to Top River Rune and found a Tidehunter acquiring Illusions.
Target Isolation.
[spoiler=]Image
Image
Image
Image[/spoiler]
11:52 - TP-ed bottom when allied Warlock was about to face Tidehunter at Scourge Tier 1 tower. Hard pinged map on allied Warlock prior any visible incoming threat. When Tidehunter appeared, Clockwerk remained motionless while opponent Huskar and Storm Spirit arrived and were advancing towards allied Warlock's position. Clockwerk stayed put for 7 seconds, did nothing except watching Warlock's death.
Irrational game play.
[spoiler=]Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image[/spoiler]
18:13 - Acquired Double Damage Rune and headed South-East. Abruptly made a directional change and headed Westward and found a retreating Huskar.
Clockwerk engaged Huskar but Cogging failed. He destroyed his Cog and exited in the direction opposite of fleeing Target instead of giving chase or throwing a hook.

Note - In FOW, there were 2 other nearby enemy heroes; Bounty Hunter and Storm Spirit. A successful hook on Huskar could prove fatal for Huskar and himself.
Disengagement of Target prior vision of Threat
[spoiler=]Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image[/spoiler]
21:16 - Several Hard Pings on Map when Invis Bounty was in the vicinity. Once more, leaving allied Warlock dead while Clockwerk retreated.
Pre-warning of Invis Threat
[spoiler=]Image
Image
Image
Image
Image[/spoiler]
21:18 <EVIL_NERO> 0x68: Map ping (X: -5758.42, Y: 4801.16)
21:23 <EVIL_NERO> 0x68: Map ping (X: -5363.99, Y: 5246.27)
21:24 <EVIL_NERO> 0x68: Map ping (X: -5043.90, Y: 5196.41)
21:25 <EVIL_NERO> 0x68: Map ping (X: -5036.56, Y: 5212.90)
21:25 <EVIL_NERO> 0x68: Map ping (X: -5035.91, Y: 5199.70)
21:25 <EVIL_NERO> 0x68: Map ping (X: -5022.30, Y: 5189.85)


With the above, Violator has proven beyond a doubt to be map hacking. Ban is made without Fog Clicks.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests