Warcraft III username: BizarroSupaman
Realm: USEast
Situation: Not quite sure, just finished a short ID where everyone fed/left... as the last player left I talked to the tit for a minute and ran in a circle to sui and save some time. Tit made some remarks like 'im gonna ban X guy' and 'you're banned mh'. I got kicked out of the next game by an Admin apparently and am banned for Map Hacking by Wyld. Last Game:
(11:14 / All) BizarroSupaman: lvl?
(11:18 / All) TitanSucksCawk: 8
(11:23 / All) TitanSucksCawk: minis 3
(11:24 / All) BizarroSupaman: mmm
(11:25 / All) TitanSucksCawk: each
(11:35 / All) TitanSucksCawk: banning isha after this
--
(12:47 / All) BizarroSupaman: welp im ded
(13:15 / All) BizarroSupaman: ;p
(13:17 / All) BizarroSupaman: gg
(13:18 / All) TitanSucksCawk: turn your mh off
(13:24 / All) BizarroSupaman: no mh
(13:27 / All) BizarroSupaman: kinda ran in a circle
(13:33 / All) TitanSucksCawk: obv mh
--
(13:54 / All) TitanSucksCawk: banned
Why you should be unbanned: I've never encountered a MH situation short of the jokes throughout games (tit mhs! etc.) I personally have never had any desire to cheat or do anything out of the ordinary besides have fun playing games with friends. I've played hundreds of games; ID 1090elo, LTD 1200, HLW 1070 (9-0 with my friend), etc. and the only time any issues have arisen are the dozen or so games I've played with Wyld. On one occasion I straight eurobased on Rad and sat in my base for the 30 minute duration of the game. After he ragequit as titan outside my base, he spent the next lobby putting me on ignore and harassing me with wild accusations that I was juking his minis around when in reality... I never even left my base.
To be brief, I simply don't maphack. If anything, I'm anti-rule breakers... just about all my posts on these forums are to report bad behavior. Yet there is no processed report for my ban, or any evidence short of the wild accusations of one eccentric person. Really, where is the due process here
Ban Appeal
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 8:58 pm
Re: Ban Appeal
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=31657&p=137515#p137515
That's the due process (pretty standard for mods to post evidence, then self confirm it) -- Post made with evidence so that it can be openly checked. Seems pretty fair, anyway Ima watch the replay ^^
--
watched replay, for the majority of the game you were in 2 base spots ( moving to the 2nd after the first died)
It doesn't even look like there is evidence to even suggest a MH, throughout the whole chase it was obvious where the Stone golems were going to anyone who knew the terrain, moreover you were literally being followed by his titan the majority of that chase.
Throughout the game your camera was mostly centred on your hero and buildings.
He also doesn't provide the replays for the "suspicious gameplay" ....
If anyone wants to confirm this, it'd be nice -- Titansuckscawk is an immature name btw ._. ?
Its probably likely he didn't check replay and just banned from the reasoning that he drew up while playing the games. If he had checked the replay he probably wouldn't of banned I think. (Conjecture here)
On a side note is it normal practice to ban someone without Admin confirmation? His ban post is still in requests (as of this post)
That's the due process (pretty standard for mods to post evidence, then self confirm it) -- Post made with evidence so that it can be openly checked. Seems pretty fair, anyway Ima watch the replay ^^
--
watched replay, for the majority of the game you were in 2 base spots ( moving to the 2nd after the first died)
It doesn't even look like there is evidence to even suggest a MH, throughout the whole chase it was obvious where the Stone golems were going to anyone who knew the terrain, moreover you were literally being followed by his titan the majority of that chase.
Throughout the game your camera was mostly centred on your hero and buildings.
He also doesn't provide the replays for the "suspicious gameplay" ....
If anyone wants to confirm this, it'd be nice -- Titansuckscawk is an immature name btw ._. ?
Its probably likely he didn't check replay and just banned from the reasoning that he drew up while playing the games. If he had checked the replay he probably wouldn't of banned I think. (Conjecture here)
On a side note is it normal practice to ban someone without Admin confirmation? His ban post is still in requests (as of this post)
Last edited by Brambleclaw on Sat May 31, 2014 9:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ban Appeal
Brambleclaw wrote:https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=31657&p=137515#p137515
Oh thank you, I must've been looking in the wrong section, I see this now.
As far as your other responses, basically yes to everything. I lumberbased twice (starting one, and then one generally away from where I last saw him). At the point of the second one, the game was over so I just ran down then went to sui after we had a little chat and he told me his tit level; I thought it was a impossible task without the necessary resources (like 14k wood for supers). He appeared as I was on my way to the mound and I just wall juked him in a circle for a minute or so for some fun... I got all my battle upgrades, might as well make them count (he 'missed' like 5 hits at the end if you watch the replay )!
But really, cmon Wyld.. you know I don't cheat, we've played together a dozen times man.
- ProfessorOak
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:17 am
- Location: Pallet town
- Has thanked: 12 times
Re: Ban Appeal
I believe you were banned based on when you clicked on this bird which wild said you had no vision of
13:48 <BizarroSupaman> 0x19: Select subgroup: [Albatross], 0x0000CA560000CA56
Yes it is an immature name but he's probably a 12 y/o.
13:48 <BizarroSupaman> 0x19: Select subgroup: [Albatross], 0x0000CA560000CA56
Titansuckscawk is an immature name btw ._. ?
Yes it is an immature name but he's probably a 12 y/o.
Re: Ban Appeal
Professoroak wrote:13:48 <BizarroSupaman> 0x19: Select subgroup: [Albatross], 0x0000CA560000CA56
EdgeOfChaos wrote:Explain the click.
Don't know, in reality I was already dead, and in which case would've shared vision with the Titan correct? (He never -boot orange in chat log). In whichever case I just responded to him a few more times and left the game after dying, I don't even remember using my mini.
Last edited by Bizarro on Sat May 31, 2014 9:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 8:58 pm
Re: Ban Appeal
Professoroak wrote:I believe you were banned based on when you clicked on this bird which wild said you had no vision of
13:48 <BizarroSupaman> 0x19: Select subgroup: [Albatross], 0x0000CA560000CA56Titansuckscawk is an immature name btw ._. ?
Yes it is an immature name but he's probably a 12 y/o.
That'd make sense for a reason then. 1 single click though is a bit thin o.O. Replay would show if its in fog I think.
Also 12y/o mod, I dont believe o.o
Last edited by Brambleclaw on Sat May 31, 2014 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ban Appeal
Opps hit quote instead of edit, dunno how to delete posts. Forgot the quote tags for Edge
- Sat
- Donor: Beyond Reproach
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:50 am
- Location: Clan BTI @ USE
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Ban Appeal
Titan had no vision of the albatross and neither did you. A number of us have suspected you maphacked in previous games.
As for banning before confirmation, yes that is standard procedure when we think we have a good case, such as this one.
Appeal denied. If you do not dodge your ban you might be unbanned by re-appealing in several months when you can convince us that you've changed.
As for banning before confirmation, yes that is standard procedure when we think we have a good case, such as this one.
Appeal denied. If you do not dodge your ban you might be unbanned by re-appealing in several months when you can convince us that you've changed.
Re: Ban Appeal
P.S. don't spread stuff like
on ban appeals please.
Yes it is an immature name but he's probably a 12 y/o.
on ban appeals please.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests