Your Warcraft III username: Temes
Realm/Gateway: europe.battle.net
Why are you banned: "Temes banned 2 days for solo send/up and suicide when not necessary."
Why you should be unbanned: Long story...
Let's defractor that game... https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=7167759
Lvl 1 I get steamrolled by orcs. Hold fine til level 3.
First mistake, didn't build enough for 4. My value was 465, others had 410. 440 and 505. Sadly I had pretty bad towers. Should have had 1 wisp less and 2 pandaren upped.
Second mistake. "Suicid" pre level 5. Now I agree afterwards that I should have upped to the second pandaren now. However I chose not to do so because I expected enemy send. Most of my games I get yelled at for not pushing enough. I've been told over and over, if I got shitty towers, just push. Now this team had the agreed opinion that it was a bad move... Even with the second panda up I should have leaked 10 hawks from 21 initially.
Next thing. Upping hp on king pre level 7. Apparently it was a huge giveaway that I upped king hp 3 times just as level 6 ended to get 9 extra gold. It didn't tell the enemy a single thing, it just makes them "think." On top of that, their decision to send 7 is almost always made already at that point. May I point out that dear duralex upped king hp to 7, also a mistake...
Then the "solo send." We have 3 holding lanes on 10 and me totally undervalued. I have pushed lumber all game. Why shouldn't I add a commander and a furb on our arena here? Pls answer this question.
On Top of that Vendeta even wants to send arena (look chat). He adds a katapult, purp who initially rages adds a ballista. So I add another random commander. The result was a full oversend. And not even a solosend. Also we won (quiet hard...)
Now while this happens and we are busy discussing, my 7/6 tech goes through. I probably would have aborted that if I had thought clear, but it was 2 much random tk talk already for me to focus. That 7/6, big mistake I agree.
Then I knew I was close to getting around 300 gold which I wanted to up my 2 gates. Rly the best thing I could do at that time besides rr for 50 gp. So I up attack 4 times. End up with 10 gold 2 much, so 1 up was legit. And tbh I clicked 2 times extra because purps and blues reaction pissed me off. I had STILL THE SAME AMOUNT OF WOOD as them. And 142 income to help me recover even if that was quiet impossible.
Now regardless of what I would have done, with that level 1 start, that reroll into random stuff, people would have complained about me. I would have been weak anyway. Now I could have talked more and defended myself and my choices. But blue and purp seemed to me like it was a waste of effort. Red had manners, so my apologies to him for not listening there.
My conclusion is that I should not have been kicked from the game. I tried my best, I did not try to tk. The game just escalated from a couple of bad choices and then I tried to minimize damage with those "ups" and "sends."
Purple and blue overract a lot. They are a lot more toxic to the community than me and I still believe that this was a votekick abuse.
Jesus I spend 2 much time on this :p Thanks for reading
I don't agree with ban decision.
Moderator: ENT Staff
- KinG23
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: I don't agree with ban decision.
Radiant asked me to handle this appeal as he does not have time today.
It is a huge give away. If your team says not to up the king, don't do it.
Solo sending is not allowed.
Another 320 lumber wasted.
You did not cooperate with the team, so the votekick against you was valid.
Link the rules for LTD here from the Wiki. And in future games, don't waste lumber if your team asks to save.
Apparently it was a huge giveaway that I upped king hp 3 times just as level 6 ended to get 9 extra gold. It didn't tell the enemy a single thing, it just makes them "think."
It is a huge give away. If your team says not to up the king, don't do it.
Why shouldn't I add a commander and a furb on our arena here? Pls answer this question.
Solo sending is not allowed.
So I up attack 4 times.
Another 320 lumber wasted.
You did not cooperate with the team, so the votekick against you was valid.
Link the rules for LTD here from the Wiki. And in future games, don't waste lumber if your team asks to save.
*kisses*
Re: I don't agree with ban decision.
Here is the link to the rules which I did read:[url][/url]
http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... ming:Rules
Now my 200 cents to this matter.
Please read the chat, at that point michonne said up king. I don't see a difference in me upping the last 2 seconds of level 6 to get 9 extra gold. For all the enemy knows we could have immo and I just up 3 wood randomly because I need 9 gold to finish a tower. The only reason most of people here interpret hp pre 7 to be stomp or wave is because people here make that a general rule that is not to be broken.
The solosend was an arena send. It was only there and I explained my thoughtprocess about it.
Now there is a big different in a random solosend on some level which only affects one random line, and a commander/furb send on arena.
Frequently people rage about arenasends like that. I have seen countless of examples where that 1 commander has made a difference. People cry about 120 wood and talk about tk when they got 400 gold extra on team. The 120 wood you often even can't send at 15 because that could split demon.
If the rule is as strict as to not "solosend" some auras in arena to gain and advantage, then I propose a serious rework of it.
3*80 = 240. I needed 1 gold. Could have sendt 1 milita instead yes (1 warlock wasted then), but I didnt know excactly how much gold I needed. Seriously, I was gonna leak a lot anyway. Can't I at least try to maximize my value for level 12?
Yes I didn't. It was my first game of the day, I was still tired after getting home. It is hard to know who to listen to because from game to game people shout out a lot of different opinions. I was not in the mood of chatting, instead I remembered "advices" from other games with other players. So my apologies to duralex. I still dislike the other 2 guys though because to me they seem narrowminded and easily triggered.
I seriously believe though that this community needs to losen up. The strict enforcement of these rules in regards to listening to the opinions of your teammates no matter what is hurting this game more than it helps. Currently there is no freedom to experiment at all. People argue hard every few games about what is the most efficient build/push. Small discrepancies lead to rage, flame and tk accusations that are completly unnecessary. This really is a bad path if you ask me butbut...
http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... ming:Rules
Now my 200 cents to this matter.
It is a huge give away. If your team says not to up the king, don't do it.
Please read the chat, at that point michonne said up king. I don't see a difference in me upping the last 2 seconds of level 6 to get 9 extra gold. For all the enemy knows we could have immo and I just up 3 wood randomly because I need 9 gold to finish a tower. The only reason most of people here interpret hp pre 7 to be stomp or wave is because people here make that a general rule that is not to be broken.
Solo sending is not allowed.
The solosend was an arena send. It was only there and I explained my thoughtprocess about it.
Now there is a big different in a random solosend on some level which only affects one random line, and a commander/furb send on arena.
Frequently people rage about arenasends like that. I have seen countless of examples where that 1 commander has made a difference. People cry about 120 wood and talk about tk when they got 400 gold extra on team. The 120 wood you often even can't send at 15 because that could split demon.
If the rule is as strict as to not "solosend" some auras in arena to gain and advantage, then I propose a serious rework of it.
Another 320 lumber wasted.
3*80 = 240. I needed 1 gold. Could have sendt 1 milita instead yes (1 warlock wasted then), but I didnt know excactly how much gold I needed. Seriously, I was gonna leak a lot anyway. Can't I at least try to maximize my value for level 12?
You did not cooperate with the team, so the votekick against you was valid.
Yes I didn't. It was my first game of the day, I was still tired after getting home. It is hard to know who to listen to because from game to game people shout out a lot of different opinions. I was not in the mood of chatting, instead I remembered "advices" from other games with other players. So my apologies to duralex. I still dislike the other 2 guys though because to me they seem narrowminded and easily triggered.
I seriously believe though that this community needs to losen up. The strict enforcement of these rules in regards to listening to the opinions of your teammates no matter what is hurting this game more than it helps. Currently there is no freedom to experiment at all. People argue hard every few games about what is the most efficient build/push. Small discrepancies lead to rage, flame and tk accusations that are completly unnecessary. This really is a bad path if you ask me butbut...
- KinG23
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: I don't agree with ban decision.
Well I'm sure you are familiar with the rules now to prevent future reports against you for this nature.
Unbanned, have fun. I would suggest avoiding playing with certain players on that bot who you feel create a toxic environment. That will result in more enjoyable games for you.
@Temes
Unbanned, have fun. I would suggest avoiding playing with certain players on that bot who you feel create a toxic environment. That will result in more enjoyable games for you.
@Temes
*kisses*
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests