Ban Appeal

[Versace]

Your Warcraft III username: Tala
Realm/Gateway: East
Why are you banned: VK abuse?
Why you should be unbanned: This is the most absurd ban I've ever seen. Not only was this from 3 weeks ago but the one we are starting a votekick against one of the worst bear players I have ever seen and the guy was purposely throwing since beginning. Goes 15/5 his first game then goes 2/4. Also ruins mid, if you're going to ban deity and I then you should obviously ban this clown too.

[BeerLord]

What criteria do you think he met to justify a votekick?

[Sylvanas]

What criteria do you think he met to justify a votekick?

I think he was not beary good.

[Versace]

Playing like a douchebag? dude saw me running to rune when I had bottle and he didn't and took that shit. And how does someone else starting a votekick and the kick not even go through justify a ban for votekick abuse? It's like sending someone who abused alcohol once to an AA meeting...

[Zeratul]

Playing like a douchebag? dude saw me running to rune when I had bottle and he didn't and took that shit. And how does someone else starting a votekick and the kick not even go through justify a ban for votekick abuse? It's like sending someone who abused alcohol once to an AA meeting...

I'll never understand this logic ("and how does someone else starting a votekick and the kick not even go through justify ...") - If you read the rules (which you should have done by now), you'd notice this:

Do not spam or randomly start !votekicks, do not !votekick to avoid being kicked, and do not !votekick without proper reasons. Votekicks are ban-able even if they are not passed since negative intentions can still be assessed and misusing it can lead others to misuse it. Kicks and bans are enforced based on how severe the rule has been violated. ENT keeps the right to enforce punishments as warning.

[Versace]

Yeah and if every tom dick and harry posted a ban for everytime thats happened you guys wouldn't have many players left.

[Zeratul]

Yeah and if every tom dick and harry posted a ban for everytime thats happened you guys wouldn't have many players left.

Well i'm pretty sure there would be a lot of actual players left (just no gameruiners, abusive votekicks, etc.) - and once again you're finding excuses to justify your actions (as if they were correct at any point)

I suggest you read the rules, recheck the replay and see if you actually had a reason to votekick him.

Dunno what's your idea of a ban request, but ENT's purpose of banning is to make sure people learn from their actions, and compromise not to repeat it (also known as don't break the rules again) - Sometimes it works, sometimes it doens't, but it's a gamble they take, and hope for a positive result (If you don't like these rules, you're more than welcome to try other bots, but speaking by experience, you won't find better dota games elsewhere; But while on ENT, yes you will have to play by their rules)

[BeerLord]

@versace please head over to our wiki and review the rule pertaining to votekicks, then copy and paste the ones that apply to your case. Also note that there are no rules granting a player sole possession of any lane, or any rune, and therefore your reasons above to justify your votekick are invalid.

[KingKar]

"there are no rules granting a player sole possession of any lane, or any rune"

Bear and lion both at top river waiting for rune, bear full hp and lion empty bottle low hp. bear takes REGEN rune and doesnt even need it, this is intentional game ruining . @beerlord

[BeerLord]

no response. processing.