Ent Abuse/mis-understanding

Looking for your appeal? Approved or denied appeals are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Ent Abuse/mis-understanding

Postby aRt)Y » Sat Mar 14, 2015 9:34 pm

@nabo. Thanks for having unbanned that other votekick guy tho /s

@WhosDaddy Due to your 1 day autoban which was still applied, your ban would technically start right now. However, I reduced it due to your cooperation and promise not to troll/violate our rules again.

Your ban will expire in 12 hours, instead of 4 days.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition

User avatar
nabo.
Donator
Posts: 11892
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
Location: Dokdo, KOREA
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 158 times

Re: Ent Abuse/mis-understanding

Postby nabo. » Sat Mar 14, 2015 9:37 pm

@art)y

That other vk guy did not deserve his ban imo.

He couldnt see sa following ppl around... sa played early game and he did pop in and died while teamfights (while following). He was afk for 3 minutes (25-28). There was only 1 votekick and saying ppl would get if no vote.
Clan High@useast

  • Check the wiki for ENT rules and general information.
  • Talk to mods on ENT chat.
  • Host games through our bots, Manage your stats, Secure your account(s), and check your ban status on ENT LINK.

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Ent Abuse/mis-understanding

Postby aRt)Y » Sat Mar 14, 2015 9:41 pm

@nabo. Dunno if you actually read the chat, too.

I would have increased his ban duration by 1/2 compared to others if it wasnt for the sake of equality.
His attitude was complete shit. He purposely did not vote because he gave a shit if they suffered due to riki or not - technically mocking them.

(24:53 / All) isuppose: we need to kick blue
(24:59 / All) isuppose: he's not even playing
(25:09 / All) King_of_Bongo: but u got oj
(25:11 / All) King_of_Bongo: so its cool
(27:59 / All) King_of_Bongo: not gonna happen
(28:28 / All) King_of_Bongo: but oj is soooo good
(28:31 / All) King_of_Bongo: its ok

Anyway, this appeal is not about king of bad attitudes. Case closed.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition


Return to “Processed Appeals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 46 guests