ENT Gaming

violator: TRADER
Violations: He didn't want to draw at minute 0
replay: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 244452.w3g

I don't understand why this guy always wants to take advantage; he only thinks about winning, and doesn't think about a fair game. It was minute 0 when one of our teammates left the team, as seen it was due to disconnection, I said to myself and my teammates to draw, and I even paused the game so the game wouldn't take any more time and I could rejoin, I did it twice and both times he paused and didn't want to draw, I don't think it's fair since the game took away a lot of our elo: -17.44

(02:16 / Allied) grok3.0: !draw
(02:16 / All) FromCali: draw it
(02:16 / Allied) Smolboi: !yes
(02:16 / All) grok3.0: kick and draw
(02:16 / All) Titanium75: NotNoOne lagged out (dropped by vote).
(02:18 / Allied) grok3.0: !draw
(02:25 / Allied) T-A-Z: !draw
(02:29 / All) coldsituation: 1 more
(02:48 / Allied) coldsituation: trader draw it
(02:49 / Allied) grok3.0: trader go draw
(02:54 / All) FromCali: bara draw it
(02:59 / All) FromCali: is min 0
(03:06 / Allied) T-A-Z: oh well
(03:06 / All) FromCali: draw it
(06:18 / Allied) grok3.0: im gonna report you
(06:19 / Allied) grok3.0: trader
(06:17 / Allied) TRADER: omg
(06:21 / Allied) TRADER: eat
(06:21 / Allied) TRADER: eat

Refusing to draw isn't even against the rules.

But even if it was, TRADER did vote to draw
(05:19 / Allied) TRADER: !draw

I understand that everyone hates him but cmon, this is just making you guys look silly.

EMANUEL FOR PREZ.

STOP THIS PETTINESS

***HUGS***

this guy has no idea whats bannable and whats not.. Can we just ban this guy for being absolutely clueless on his ban request? I think hes like 1 for 10 on his ban post. It was funny at first but now its just annoying.

AND you wanted to become admin? WTFFFF?! EMAN I seriously don't think you understand what should be reported. I get it that youre posting alot of ban request to up your chances on becoming an admin but you should focus more on how to play the game correctly first.

I have asked several times to give !draw in similar games and they didn't do it, I reported it and they didn't ban it... so I didn't give draw

@FromCali - read the rules below with your google translator. Outdated but gives you the general guideline.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170606084 ... ming:Rules

Also, this below applies to both you and trader. Stop spamming pings the minute you see a hero on the map, it's so annoying and hinders us from looking at the map .
Do not spam during games (chat, ping, etc.)

I accept that I may not have read the rules when I sent the appeal, I just have to be logical, if a player leaves the game at the beginning, the fair thing would be to make it a draw. Appeals are for a fair game, and a 4v5 game doesn't seem fair to me. In any case, I learn more about this every day.

I've had a lot of experience with this. I really wish they would please have the ego to win a fair game without imbalances. I don't understand why more and more people want to get an advantage over the other. And even if that wasn't a rule, it doesn't seem fair to me.

@MR_Nimbuss I do this for a fair game, every day I meet people who just care about winning and are not guided by having a nice and fun game.

I think the decision to continue the game should be up to the team that lost a player. The entire team should rally behind the decision of the disadvantaged team.

Could this become a regulation?

showtime18 wrote:I think the decision to continue the game should be up to the team that lost a player. The entire team should rally behind the decision of the disadvantaged team.

Could this become a regulation?

No, that would be a loophole for a team that is losing to convince a player to d/c themselves and then get a game drawn. As old as ENT is, the current rules in place are pretty well-thought out to prevent something like this from happening.

The current system is fine. 4v5 games are winnable and in certain cases, more preferable. The problem is the team with the four players also had FromCali which is basically a 3v6 game.

Also, Trader refused to draw the game early on. It was only minutes after that he decided to draw but I think at that time, most of the !draw votes were recalled so it inevitably didn't draw and even though only a few minutes passed, most players just assumed that we were just going to play it out.

Nothing against Trader for not drawing when he had the chance to but he does complain often and expect others to do things that he wishes but wouldn't draw a game that every player had wanted to be drawn. How many times has Trader votekicked someone?

Please can you read rules before to make an appeal ?
Okey refusing to draw is not fair but that's not bannable.
And trader, come on stop beeing unfair sériously i think i gave you many chances here with mikejones