ENT Gaming

Battle.net username: PresTeddy
Realm: West
Gamename: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #49
Bot username:
Situation:
Why you should be unbanned:

I very disappointed in the lack of professionalism through ENT. In past topics on ENT forums I thought ENT displayed a sense of professionalism. However, I now know otherwise. I was banned for flaming, and I do not deny that. However, I was not the instigator. I was not the first to name call. Chat history shows that. This was my first interaction with AdventureClub during game [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #49. First interaction happend 20 mins in game. As you clearly see I was not the first to name call. He began call myself and other teammates "dumb noobs" "noob shit" and saying "Stfu" and "how stupid are you" After this I began to flame him. I do not deny that. I just believe if you are trying to have a professional hosting forum there should be an administrators code of conduct. Why is he allowed to instigate the name calling and have no recourse. That is bully tactics. If administrators are going to play games with "normal" gamers they need to be held to a higher standard. Some sort of code of conduct should be laid out for them. What adventureclub abused his power as administrator and disregarded any of the Dota rules for himself. That is unfair. If ENT wants keep providing professional hosting forums and gameplay they need to quickly lay out some guidelines for administraters when playing and banning players. Because as you can see adventureclub clearly was the person who began the name calling which began the flaming by me. Yet I'm the one who is banned simply because he is an adminstartor.

Please any other administrator reply back with comments, questions, or concerns. I would to know what ENT thinks of this.

(20:23 / Allied) PresTeddy: teachies need to do something
(20:25 / Allied) PresTeddy: wow
(20:27 / Allied) Mambo: ya
(20:29 / Allied) Mambo: what the fuck
(20:32 / Allied) AdvntrClb: stfu
(20:36 / Allied) Mambo: no mines
(20:38 / Allied) Mambo: anywhgere
(20:44 / Allied) AdvntrClb: how stupid are u
(20:44 / Allied) PresTeddy: fromt he start of game
(20:45 / Allied) PresTeddy: wtf
(21:37 / Allied) AdvntrClb: i got all of em off
(21:39 / Allied) AdvntrClb: so stfu
(21:42 / Allied) dotarulez: u got one late
(21:45 / Allied) AdvntrClb: no
(21:46 / Allied) AdvntrClb: they all hit
(21:47 / Allied) AdvntrClb: u dumb noob
(22:49 / Allied) PresTeddy: wtf
(22:57 / Allied) PresTeddy: wow
(23:01 / Allied) PresTeddy: can we kick teachied
(23:09 / Allied) AdvntrClb: are u stpuid?
(23:10 / Allied) AdvntrClb: noob?
(23:13 / Allied) PresTeddy: that was fucking terrible
(23:20 / Allied) PresTeddy: looks like your stupid
(23:21 / Allied) AdvntrClb: tiny was ful hp
(23:23 / Allied) AdvntrClb: u noob shit
(23:26 / Allied) PresTeddy: hahahaha
(23:29 / Allied) PresTeddy: bs he has no clue
(23:32 / Allied) AdvntrClb: how about i ban u?

Didn't your ban get rejected already? And you intentionally left off where you tell him to ban you, and parts where you are rude.

However, I'll approve this ban because people could have used !ignore on you and you did go through and post a ban appeal. In the future if you don't want to listen to someone (even if it's a moderator), though, you should use the !ignore command too.

Edit: er... this appeal..