ENT Gaming

Your Warcraft III username: EthanolEvert
Realm/Gateway: europe.battle.net
Why are you banned: Second violation of excessive delay; TID 87083
Why you should be unbanned: I was in the understanding that cornerdelay was 120 max (instead of entire delay). Which I think is sketchy because if I build in a zig-zag manner I still hold everything but levels really take long. Anyway....I just got a three-day ban because apparently I did excessive delay before which I simply did not. I read the rules and I understand why I'm in the wrong and it will not happen again. Furthermore I will inform those that use the same trick that it is not allowed

Link to ban-req. thread: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=87083

Hello EthanolEvert,

please link us the general rules and the game specific rules of the game(s) you got banned in, and highlight the specific rule(s) you believe you violated.
You can find them on our wiki.

That way, we can ensure another rule-violation by you, caused by not-knowing the rules, will not happen again. After linking us to the rules, we expect you to have read them. Cooperating with us will have a positive effect on your ban duration.

@EthanolEvert

@Amnon

@ethanolevert Please do as @Hyo has asked and tag us. I understand that you may have not "understood" the rule, but please do not try to seek out ways to get around the rules in general. Chances are that those actions are banable.

@AmmoN @Hyo

Do you know the thread(s) that were used to come to this rule? I would like to see the discussion for further understanding. At any rate, the unban will come too late since I missed my gaming time already, will be afk for 2 days now. Regardless, here are the rules for good measure to show that I have indeed re-read them and understood which one I violated. Have a good one guys, thanks for replying.

http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... g:LTDRules
Do not build over 120 value of delay towers.

Unbanned this time.

@ethanolevert I do not know when or how the rules were generated but again, I would advise you to at least abide by the spirit of the existing rule next time you think you have found a loophole.