Matdas

[starfishprime]

This is regarding ban appeal: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=36213

I have written what I think is a complete (827 words!) and reasonable explanation of why the ban against me is unfair and the ban request malicious. Matdas has addressed none of my points but rather simply asserted in 2 sentences that I am "psychic" and that I "coordinated" my moves with player blue.

Would it be more fair to have someone other that the person who banned me (Matdas) have a look at my ban appeal?

Thanks.

[Love]

Well, first of all. Nobody wants to read a book about why you should be unbanned. Secondly, it is usually the mod who banned you that will review your case as it was their decision to ban you, and therfore their decision to unban/reduce your ban sentence. I do not play RISK but to me it does seem fishy that you and blue player were coordinated well despite lack of communication, but as i stated. I don't play risk.

@matdas

[matdas]

i state two sentences and you go straight to complaint. childish much? There is no reason for this complaint. your appeal is still open. Sorry you can't handle sarcasm. and in my opinion, you did pre-team which is why you were banned in the first place.

Besides, the ban appeal is still open. complain is invalid unless i did something abusive.