I would like someone to look at this again. thank you

[appleapple]

https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=48619
can someone please look at this again.

"LB did state he was going AFK."
Then he should go AFK in the seed nearby the base. Not decide to go into somewhere he knows he's not allowed in. Literally the seed is like a 4 second walk from the base, there's no excuse. Even though it's really mean, no matter how you want to look at it. he was still violating the rule. Violation of ENT's rules, results "in a warning, a temporary ban or a permanent ban."


"@Dehumanchum If someone asks you to share control, whether your intention is to leave the base or not you do it."
just curious, is this considered his "warning" for the rule he just broke? &if so, then how/why does it not result in a ban? Also, if "jinnilto" doesn't have an ENT account on here, if a warning is the decision from this, then how does ENT go about doing that?

(15:26 / Allied) DOPE: share control
(15:32 / Allied) Dehumanchum: no
(13:52 / Allied) Dehumanchum: ill make sure to it they dont get banned
^
Most likely didn't share control, even knowing the rules and just wants to get around breaking/manipulating them.

Rule = Refusing to leave base after being asked by owner. Meanwhile, you must share your control with the base owner, so he can move your builder inside the base. = Dehumanchum, jinnilto Violated the rule.

"No rules were really broken here."
There is two right in front of you, neither of the two (Dehumanchum, jinnilto) shared control. The only person that did was zakaevier.

[Stealer]

eh, warned them.

Quality forum ban dodge.