Admins approving their own reports

[AvadaKedavra]

Hey I just got banned by Nabo / "mokko" . He made the report himself and instantly approved it himself... Another guy who got banned "king123" I think made appeal and got instant denied by Nabo again.... Maybe the same admin reporting people shouldn't be the one approving them?

Reason for the bans were:
"Leaked more than me and possessed less lumber than me overall and still QQ"

Uhm ok? So I leaked more than Nabo / "mokko" when he had elite archer and I had mudmen captain on lvl 5, is that reason for ban? Could some OTHER admin talk a serious look at this, since I feel Nabo is raging / abusing his admin position and smashing loyal players on this bot. This is not how I would expect to be treated by an admin at least, and it's NOT something that makes me feel welcome here, sadly

In before Nabo denies this post

[nabo.]

Hey I just got banned by Nabo / "mokko" . He made the report himself and instantly approved it himself... Another guy who got banned "king123" I think made appeal and got instant denied by Nabo again.... Maybe the same admin reporting people shouldn't be the one approving them?

Mods have processed own ban requests for years. Only reasons we post them is for documentation purpose and transparency.

https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=67989
Wrong again. He did appeal and was approved. Instead of appealing, learn the rules, and realize what was wrong, you posted a complaint instead.

Reason for the bans were:
"Leaked more than me and possessed less lumber than me overall and still QQ"

Not the reason I stated. I will note though that this is a 1 day warning ban.

(01:35 / Allied) AvadaKedavra: red?
(01:35 / Allied) mokko: yes?
(01:35 / Allied) mokko: ill b ok
(01:35 / All) TinSoldier: LOL
(01:35 / All) kinG23: hes in dg
(01:35 / All) TinSoldier: banned
(01:35 / Allied) mokko: u can
(01:35 / All) kinG23: with 5 sec
(01:35 / All) TinSoldier: BANNED
(01:35 / All) nore]juno: MOKKO
(01:35 / All) AvadaKedavra: I mean
(01:35 / All) nore]juno: ABUSER?
(01:35 / Allied) mokko: 1 square in
(01:35 / All) AvadaKedavra: cna we draw?
(01:35 / Allied) mokko: plz learn rules

I clearly stated that I'll be ok. + Even if you did suspect that I was going to tk, you should have continued playing when you saw I was indeed holding my lane well instead of starting to QQ 1-2 minutes into the game .

(01:38 / All) AvadaKedavra: plz
(01:38 / All) tariq.td: if he builld in dg we agree
(01:38 / All) AvadaKedavra: Draw
(01:38 / All) tariq.td: np
(01:38 / All) AvadaKedavra: this is unplayable

I was playing fine. Under what basis you claim the game was unplayable? Your short thinking and/or lack of knowledge and/or invalid proof.

(05:35 / Allied) AvadaKedavra: !ff
(05:35 / All) AvadaKedavra: [AvadaKedavra] has voted to forfeit.

Forfeiting the game for no reason.

(06:03 / All) AvadaKedavra: well landmines instead of ea legit?
(06:08 / All) thandrin: legit strat
(06:10 / All) thandrin: next level

Legit indeed.

(07:18 / Allied) mokko: go 5 or 7
(07:19 / Allied) mokko: ?
(07:23 / Allied) AvadaKedavra: w/e
(07:32 / Allied) AvadaKedavra: !ff
(07:34 / Allied) kinG23: dont ff
(07:35 / Allied) kinG23: wtf
(07:37 / Allied) AvadaKedavra: go ff

Refused to play and communicate.

Did I tk you? No. Did you tk me? Yes.

I'll leave this for another mod to process.

[MarshMallows]

There is a secret legion league where you are only allowed build T1 for level 1 T2 for level 2 etc... until you get to level 6 and all units are unlocked... in this league [we call it Legion out house league] landmine archer mix is very common.

[AvadaKedavra]

I did not stop playing, although I did try to draw / ff thats true. You can ask for a draw / ff and still keep on playing no? But if admins can process their own requests AND appeals I guess there's nothing to come after here. Guess I'll just have to careful with admins ingame, since if they see fit they can ban with no chance of appealing, and no second opinion possible from other admins.

So what if and admin is out of line or wrong? Guess it's too bad for you then.

[SLSGuennter]

Just cause you dont know the strat used by nabo, it dont means its tk
And QQing hard + trying to ff without a legit reason is indeed a reason for a 1 day warning ban.
Btw, if you feel banned unfairly you should first try to appeal and not go for a complaint.

[Hatedmaru]

https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.p ... 25#p273825

After watching the replay, the only time nabo/mokko missed sending with the team was on 2, but i don't really consider his fault - The massive spamming/complaining and overall team attitude was horrific.

I don't see his ban being abusive at all either - 1 day ban warning considering your attitude + refusing to communicate with your team as displayed:

(07:18 / Allied) mokko: go 5 or 7
(07:19 / Allied) mokko: ?
(07:23 / Allied) AvadaKedavra: w/e
(07:32 / Allied) AvadaKedavra: !ff
(07:34 / Allied) kinG23: dont ff
(07:35 / Allied) kinG23: wtf
(07:37 / Allied) AvadaKedavra: go ff

I also suggest you take some time reading both general and ltd rules to avoid accusing players of breaking rules (speaking directly about the dark green situation) - Rules can be found here in our Wiki: http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?title=Main_Page

And as mentioned before by other moderators, you should have indeed posted a ban appeal first, explaining yourself and it would have been solved easily without the need for the complaint.

PS: As mentioned before by Nabo. , not knowing the full potential of every tower on LTD is not a reason to consider a game unplayable -> You should have waited/played it, and see how it would go (In the end, it proved he wasn't teamkilling at all).

Complaint denied, processing