https://gyazo.com/48a828ff0011359394c6f57917e9c351
This is a valid strategy in legion 1200. You sell your lane and use the gold for more push. He is using this reason for an 5 days ban. Why are admins able to ban people in the LTD section if they dont understand the game?
Complaining about an moderator.
Moderator: Oversight Staff
-
- Treant
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:18 pm
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: Complaining about an moderator.
paschy90 wrote:https://gyazo.com/48a828ff0011359394c6f57917e9c351
This is a valid strategy in legion 1200. You sell your lane and use the gold for more push. He is using this reason for an 5 days ban. Why are admins able to ban people in the LTD section if they dont understand the game?
please add the link to your ban request
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Complaining about an moderator.
I believe this is the replay in question:
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=137052
I even was in that game. Overall really messy shit in team west. I don't see how selling all units at once did help u anyhow since you can't even push that fast, but taking the whole picture into consideration, a ban didn't have to apply here. You could argue that the sui was poorly executed and poor gameplay is not bannable. If I am correct red (who is the op of that brq) also refused to go 10 holder with hydra warlocks. That was far worse than purp selling units.
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=137052
I even was in that game. Overall really messy shit in team west. I don't see how selling all units at once did help u anyhow since you can't even push that fast, but taking the whole picture into consideration, a ban didn't have to apply here. You could argue that the sui was poorly executed and poor gameplay is not bannable. If I am correct red (who is the op of that brq) also refused to go 10 holder with hydra warlocks. That was far worse than purp selling units.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:37 am
- Location: Islamic State
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
- Contact:
Re: Complaining about an moderator.
1200+ rule regarding selling from wiki:
The justification for the ban has nothing to do with this rule either.
. Dont see how it applies to selling on 9 or 10 unless it was a race on 10 or 12 maybe.Selling value at any point in the game in order to gain an advantage by stalling time on a racing level is forbidden
The justification for the ban has nothing to do with this rule either.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 683
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:07 pm
- Location: Norway
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Complaining about an moderator.
The 1200+ selling value rule wasnt used for this game.
I would assume he just used the general rules.
1.Do not teamkill (ex. blocking, maliciously using spells, destroying/hiding/stealing/massing items, selling towers, etc).
I would assume he just used the general rules.
1.Do not teamkill (ex. blocking, maliciously using spells, destroying/hiding/stealing/massing items, selling towers, etc).
- These users thanked the author Stiff_Maistar for the post:
- KiwiLeKiller (Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:39 pm)
What did snow white say when the dwarves saw her naked?
7-UP
https://www.facebook.com/TehLurdOfTehReingsOfficial/videos/710971672378120/
7-UP
https://www.facebook.com/TehLurdOfTehReingsOfficial/videos/710971672378120/
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 5:52 am
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Complaining about an moderator.
But he didn't, it's normal for suiciders who can't comeback to sell towers in order to push more. That's what i've read was happening here.
holymoly: lot of ppl want play with me.
ROFL
ROFL
- TrueChaos
- ENT Staff
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: Canada
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 39 times
Re: Complaining about an moderator.
After reviewing this replay, -> viewtopic.php?f=24&t=137052
00:18:12 sold Blood Raider.
00:18:16 sold Raider.
00:18:19 sold Orc Warlock.
00:18:25 sold another Orc Warlock.
00:18:26 sold another Blood Raider.
00:18:27 sold Magnataur.
You sold all towers which is a rule violation that was being enforced under game ruining rules.
00:18:12 sold Blood Raider.
00:18:16 sold Raider.
00:18:19 sold Orc Warlock.
00:18:25 sold another Orc Warlock.
00:18:26 sold another Blood Raider.
00:18:27 sold Magnataur.
You sold all towers which is a rule violation that was being enforced under game ruining rules.
Do not teamkill (ex. blocking, maliciously using spells, destroying/hiding/stealing/massing items, selling towers, etc).
- Quetra
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 4775
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:11 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
Re: Complaining about an moderator.
I should mention that instead of posting a screenshot of my reply, you should have simply linked the appeal, as it gives my response context:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=137761
You were saying that you were banned only because of a misclick on regen and not mentioning the main reason for the ban in the appeal, leading to a number of other people complaining about the ban being unfair on that basis. This wasn't the reason, and I denied the appeal since you were being misleading and not engaging with the main reason for the ban.
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=137761
You were saying that you were banned only because of a misclick on regen and not mentioning the main reason for the ban in the appeal, leading to a number of other people complaining about the ban being unfair on that basis. This wasn't the reason, and I denied the appeal since you were being misleading and not engaging with the main reason for the ban.
- Merex
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 6640
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:45 pm
- Location: United States
- Has thanked: 297 times
- Been thanked: 182 times
Re: Complaining about an moderator.
While the question of the "suicide" strategy is coming into play here, this simply isn't the case. You can see in the chatlog that the team wasn't in favor of this and so forth.
(18:41 / Allied) DarkKnight: he sold
(18:42 / Allied) DarkKnight: everything ?
(18:44 / Allied) Legion90: gg
(18:52 / Allied) Legion90: we die
(18:53 / Allied) Legion90: :)
(18:55 / Allied) Legion90: and red 75
(18:57 / Allied) Legion90: LMAO
(18:58 / Allied) DarkKnight: did he just sell all his towers ?? ?
(19:02 / All) Legion90: gg
(19:03 / Allied) kageschwump: ye
(19:04 / Allied) kageschwump: he did
(19:05 / Allied) DarkKnight: why
(19:08 / Allied) kageschwump: idk
(19:10 / All) Legion90: red hydra locks, says he cant hold 10
(19:10 / Allied) kageschwump: says you tk
(19:14 / All) Legion90: goes 7 5
(19:16 / Allied) Legion90: !ff
(19:21 / Allied) DarkKnight: he is so bann
(19:26 / Allied) iusedtolovemee: 48
(19:28 / All) DarkKnight: he is getting bann
(19:32 / Allied) ratedlol: wtf is wrong with u purp
After having seen the replay/another mod as-well, I agree with the both of them and will side that this, in combination with the above, is a violation of our game ruining rule and that the ban was valid.
That being said, no signs of mod abuse.
Processed.
(18:41 / Allied) DarkKnight: he sold
(18:42 / Allied) DarkKnight: everything ?
(18:44 / Allied) Legion90: gg
(18:52 / Allied) Legion90: we die
(18:53 / Allied) Legion90: :)
(18:55 / Allied) Legion90: and red 75
(18:57 / Allied) Legion90: LMAO
(18:58 / Allied) DarkKnight: did he just sell all his towers ?? ?
(19:02 / All) Legion90: gg
(19:03 / Allied) kageschwump: ye
(19:04 / Allied) kageschwump: he did
(19:05 / Allied) DarkKnight: why
(19:08 / Allied) kageschwump: idk
(19:10 / All) Legion90: red hydra locks, says he cant hold 10
(19:10 / Allied) kageschwump: says you tk
(19:14 / All) Legion90: goes 7 5
(19:16 / Allied) Legion90: !ff
(19:21 / Allied) DarkKnight: he is so bann
(19:26 / Allied) iusedtolovemee: 48
(19:28 / All) DarkKnight: he is getting bann
(19:32 / Allied) ratedlol: wtf is wrong with u purp
After having seen the replay/another mod as-well, I agree with the both of them and will side that this, in combination with the above, is a violation of our game ruining rule and that the ban was valid.
That being said, no signs of mod abuse.
Processed.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests