NUTZ

Processed complaints will be moved here.

Moderator: Oversight Staff

Warning
Aura Tree
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:25 pm

NUTZ

Postby Warning » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:44 pm

Nutz should not be a admin all he does is abuse it and make the rest of ent look bad. This guy is ridiculous.

User avatar
teller55
Donator
Posts: 3229
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:15 pm
Location: Wisconsin, US
Contact:

Re: NUTZ

Postby teller55 » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:51 pm

Warning wrote:Nutz should not be a admin[...]
Even if he raped your puppies, you need to post evidence, replays, screen shots, any reasons whatsoever if you want someone's admin taken away. It's not exactly something just taken lightly off of one user's rage post.

Warning
Aura Tree
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:25 pm

Re: NUTZ

Postby Warning » Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:06 pm

I was banned for no reason. I posted for a ban and he banned me.

Warning
Aura Tree
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:25 pm

Re: NUTZ

Postby Warning » Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:08 pm

There is absolutely no reason why i shouldve been banned. I posted for 2 people to be banned for votekick abuse and he banned me.

Warning
Aura Tree
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:25 pm

Re: NUTZ

Postby Warning » Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:08 pm

Thats admin abuse if you ask me. I did nothing wrong in the game.

User avatar
ForMaDawgS
Treant Protector
Posts: 764
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:28 am
Location: San Antonio Tx

Re: NUTZ

Postby ForMaDawgS » Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:09 pm

okay its in my thoughts and other topics that nutz banned warning for flaming and even you teller know there is no ban for flaming there is a topic by uakfb that says you cannot ban some one for flaming look to it and unban warning i do not know warning i just would like to see fairness. the topic may be in the admin tab or it might be archived no disrepect meant but there was a reason i did not support nutz application he isnt a fair admin. hes a child imo :) now unban warning for fairness.
Image

Warning
Aura Tree
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:25 pm

Re: NUTZ

Postby Warning » Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:22 pm

Nutz is bias against me because we had problems with each other before he was a admin.

uakf.b
Staff Department
Posts: 7829
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: NUTZ

Postby uakf.b » Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:23 pm

You were banned because you violated the rule for excessive flaming. You've been unbanned only because you were the one who posted the ban request and you would probably not have been banned otherwise. If you are caught again you will receive a longer ban. Moving to processed.
dWFrZi5i -- 'cause I'm cool like Agreements


Return to “Processed Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests