Hi people, I want to ask you to open this kind of server, i read somewhere that the problem was there is not enough game per week. In my opinion this argument is wrong. Indeed you have to notice the time that people leave the game only because of stackers and so the teams are not balance. We are loosing so many time only to get a fair game. And that is the real problem.
Sorry for my bad english.
LTD 3.5Beta 1100+
Moderator: Oversight Staff
Re: LTD 3.5Beta 1100+
Yes I already read it but I think the low number of game made is due to the fact that people constantly leave the game because usualy every high elo player join the same team so we have something as:
east team : 14xx 13xx 12xx 16xx
vs
West team : 8xx 9xx 9xx
1/29
Then someone joins the game, he type !scores and leave. And it s like that for 5 minutes on 3games/5
Finaly we are doing unfair game and it s over after lvl 10, and it s only the high elo team which lead the game. I mean by that that s the high elo team which decide when they finish the game, at level 7 we choise, do we save to end it 12 , 13 or 14 ? or do we yolo more and finish it 17 a bit safer with king uped.
Yesterday during a game i was talking with some players and no one is against a new bot. But we are desesperate because it has been denied twice, I also read the link and you are right but as heroin I think that bot needs a chance. There are some bots which are hosting game that never start!
But do as you have to.
Thanks for the fast answer even if it doesn't make me feel happy
east team : 14xx 13xx 12xx 16xx
vs
West team : 8xx 9xx 9xx
1/29
Then someone joins the game, he type !scores and leave. And it s like that for 5 minutes on 3games/5
Finaly we are doing unfair game and it s over after lvl 10, and it s only the high elo team which lead the game. I mean by that that s the high elo team which decide when they finish the game, at level 7 we choise, do we save to end it 12 , 13 or 14 ? or do we yolo more and finish it 17 a bit safer with king uped.
Yesterday during a game i was talking with some players and no one is against a new bot. But we are desesperate because it has been denied twice, I also read the link and you are right but as heroin I think that bot needs a chance. There are some bots which are hosting game that never start!
But do as you have to.
Thanks for the fast answer even if it doesn't make me feel happy
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: LTD 3.5Beta 1100+
@yzz
Well, the main reason it got denied was due to insufficient number of supports from the community. You gonna have to tell others to voice their opinion.
Well, the main reason it got denied was due to insufficient number of supports from the community. You gonna have to tell others to voice their opinion.
- Akitos
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:17 am
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: LTD 3.5Beta 1100+
I highly doubt there are enough ppl who prefer to play beta over normal ltd to fill a 1,1k bot on a regular basis. Everyone knows beta niveau is MUCH lower than 3.41. There is a reason some players go there to farm up their elo ^^
LTD 1 & 2 veteran | full-time streamer @twitch/akitos
- SLSGuennter
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:39 am
- Location: Ingame ... most likely
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 102 times
Re: LTD 3.5Beta 1100+
there are simply to less players to get this bot going.
its not only about the "games per week" its also about the "players per bot"
its not only about the "games per week" its also about the "players per bot"
Last edited by Stealer on Thu Apr 02, 2015 4:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: drama incited
Reason: drama incited
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Return to “Suggestion Archive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests