Add 6.83d on em bots?

Suggestions will be moved here once processed.

Moderator: Oversight Staff

User avatar
TheLordGr
Forest Walker
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:32 am
Location: Greece
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 5 times
Contact:

Add 6.83d on em bots?

Postby TheLordGr » Fri Jul 24, 2015 2:18 pm

Why not adding 6.83d on em bots? Just curious.

User avatar
nabo.
Donator
Posts: 11892
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
Location: Dokdo, KOREA
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 158 times

Re: Add 6.83d on em bots?

Postby nabo. » Fri Jul 24, 2015 2:36 pm

Hmm...some nabs were in refusal to change and argued that 6.81 was the best dota1 mode, but apparently they did not realize that 6.81 was based on dota2 as well~

Perhaps it is time to host 6.83.
These users thanked the author nabo. for the post:
TheLordGr (Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:45 pm)
Clan High@useast

  • Check the wiki for ENT rules and general information.
  • Talk to mods on ENT chat.
  • Host games through our bots, Manage your stats, Secure your account(s), and check your ban status on ENT LINK.

LiquidShards
Armored Tree
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 6:04 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Add 6.83d on em bots?

Postby LiquidShards » Fri Jul 31, 2015 6:55 pm

Apparently 6.83d can be abused on em so ENT admins wanted to only host ap which didn't go over well. I for one disliked massive changes to the map and changed hero abilities. Ie. Rosh location does not need to be changed "because that's where it is in Dota2 (aka Steam DotA)". The gaps between the trees are huge which changes chasing and sight. Imho the map has been refined over too many years and versions to justify such a massive and abrupt change. It's not surprising that we're seeing balancing issues that make em unplayable for instance.

User avatar
Dust
Armored Tree
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:19 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Add 6.83d on em bots?

Postby Dust » Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:01 pm

I also dislike some changes in 6.83, but we've playing 6.81 em on ent for quite some time now. Even noobs are starting to realize how heroes like meepo are broken in em.

User avatar
Enterprise1
Forest Walker
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:47 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Add 6.83d on em bots?

Postby Enterprise1 » Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:17 pm

nabo. wrote:Hmm...some nabs were in refusal to change and argued that 6.81 was the best dota1 mode, but apparently they did not realize that 6.81 was based on dota2 as well~

Perhaps it is time to host 6.83.


Agreed with @Nabo Would be nice to host 6.83d Idk 6.81 isn't bad at all but its up to red guys :D
بث الفيديو المباشر

User avatar
F-Train
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3291
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: New York
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: Add 6.83d on em bots?

Postby F-Train » Fri Aug 21, 2015 1:18 am

6.84b on all bots please. EM no longer affects the game. Perhaps for a trial period like last time. I think this map is more stable now. See how everyone thinks about the new map. I think a lot of ppl will like it @nabo.
Having an unstable internet connection or a high risk of lagging out? Are you tired of losing a won game because you disconnected?
    Do not worry, there are solutions to solve your problem!
    • ENT Connect is a on LAN connection based reconnection tool (no cd-keys needed).
    • GProxy++(Varlock) is a reconnection tool for the battle.net with an external prompt.
    • GProxy++ DLL is a reconnection plugin for battle.net (Recommended).
    For technical issues or questions, post a topic in the technical support forum.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Have a question? Search below for your answer :)

    Not sure if you're banned? Don't know how long or why you're banned? Click this
    Image

    AndyMaster
    Armored Tree
    Posts: 95
    Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2015 8:36 pm
    Has thanked: 1 time
    Been thanked: 5 times

    Re: Add 6.83d on em bots?

    Postby AndyMaster » Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:08 pm

    Yes, PLEASE switch past 6.81. . . Meepo is WAY broken and so is LC. Its time to upgrade all of the EM servers to 6.83D.

    User avatar
    F-Train
    Protector of Nature
    Posts: 3291
    Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:55 pm
    Location: New York
    Has thanked: 27 times
    Been thanked: 105 times

    Re: Add 6.83d on em bots?

    Postby F-Train » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:16 pm

    Having an unstable internet connection or a high risk of lagging out? Are you tired of losing a won game because you disconnected?

      Do not worry, there are solutions to solve your problem!
      • ENT Connect is a on LAN connection based reconnection tool (no cd-keys needed).

      • GProxy++(Varlock) is a reconnection tool for the battle.net with an external prompt.

      • GProxy++ DLL is a reconnection plugin for battle.net (Recommended).


      For technical issues or questions, post a topic in the technical support forum.

      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
      Have a question? Search below for your answer :)






      Not sure if you're banned? Don't know how long or why you're banned? Click this
      Image

      User avatar
      nabo.
      Donator
      Posts: 11892
      Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
      Location: Dokdo, KOREA
      Has thanked: 44 times
      Been thanked: 158 times

      Re: Add 6.83d on em bots?

      Postby nabo. » Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:31 pm

      I see a lot of people playing some of their games on dota void, just because it hosts 6.83 which is closer to the current dota2 meta. I just want more people to try the new map. If people naturally end up playing 6.81 more, guess thats how we will stay or tryout 6.83 then.

      We will be swapping maps between ent11 and ent7 + ent38 and ent10.

      Note, both versions will be hosted still.
      Clan High@useast






      • Check the wiki for ENT rules and general information.
      • Talk to mods on ENT chat.
      • Host games through our bots, Manage your stats, Secure your account(s), and check your ban status on ENT LINK.


      Return to “Suggestion Archive”

      Who is online

      Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests