https://www.phpbb.com/customise/db/mod/ ... m_creator/
Could something like this be beneficial, rewritten to include drop boxes for specific Games/Violations?
Simplified BRQ/Appeal form
Moderator: Oversight Staff
- Jiminy_Cricket
- Poison Treant
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 11:50 pm
- Location: Montana
- Has thanked: 83 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form
hmmm. Yes I agree. Mandatory fill in boxes including a time stamp box that will not allow "all game" as an answer.
Off topic:
Av1oN: Announcing the official ban of jiminy_cricket
Av1oN: From all LoD bots
Av1oN: for 1 year
HazarDous: rofl
Sat: wtf
HazarDous: he would turn crazy
Sat: tats like banning batman from gotham
HazarDous: XD
Av1oN: so who's making the brq
Av1oN: Announcing the official ban of jiminy_cricket
Av1oN: From all LoD bots
Av1oN: for 1 year
HazarDous: rofl
Sat: wtf
HazarDous: he would turn crazy
Sat: tats like banning batman from gotham
HazarDous: XD
Av1oN: so who's making the brq
Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form
I agree, this would be a good format to have. It would increase productivity due to reducing the amount of 'all game' requests.
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form
Moderators simply have to post "please provide more times-temps or your request might get denied".
Having it mandatory with a blacklist of words is not beneficial.
Having it mandatory with a blacklist of words is not beneficial.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
- Shameless
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:37 pm
- Location: New York
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form
np. I was not really thinking time stamps, more along the lines of people who might not know how to say/write everything can look at a list of violations/realms/games and so on. Was just thought.
We Dance On The Brink Of Madness
- Jiminy_Cricket
- Poison Treant
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 11:50 pm
- Location: Montana
- Has thanked: 83 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form
aRt)Y wrote:Moderators simply have to post "please provide more times-temps or your request might get denied".
Having it mandatory with a blacklist of words is not beneficial.
It is beneficial when you factor in the time it takes for mods to check their request, then for the player to get back to them, then for the mod to check the request again. A simple fill in the blank time stamps box that requires numbers and has a check box for replay or game time would cut down on time in the long run fo shizz my nizz.
Off topic:
Av1oN: Announcing the official ban of jiminy_cricket
Av1oN: From all LoD bots
Av1oN: for 1 year
HazarDous: rofl
Sat: wtf
HazarDous: he would turn crazy
Sat: tats like banning batman from gotham
HazarDous: XD
Av1oN: so who's making the brq
Av1oN: Announcing the official ban of jiminy_cricket
Av1oN: From all LoD bots
Av1oN: for 1 year
HazarDous: rofl
Sat: wtf
HazarDous: he would turn crazy
Sat: tats like banning batman from gotham
HazarDous: XD
Av1oN: so who's making the brq
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form
Having restrictions like "requires numbers" wont work though, as I said. Ban requests and the way people post them are too individual.
I will have a look into it anyway.
I will have a look into it anyway.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
Return to “Suggestion Archive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 136 guests