dota

[QTriNitY]

Lets get the Admins on it then. To decide with or against.

[suckmyclick]

Lets get the Admins on it then. To decide with or against.

alright. how do we do that? haha

[QTriNitY]

Simple, watch this.

[spoiler=]Equivalent to the 911 you dial for an Emergency. Bomb in ENT[/spoiler]

@uakf.b

[VirusHunter]

look, IMO. 1v1 is dumb to autohost. you wanna pk someone just host your own game and vs that person. auto-hosting 3v3 is a good idea however. why not test this out and see where it could go.
I used to play 3v3 a lot and it is a fun way to match stack vs stack. you wanna stack that's great; verse another stack team. not saying that this is the only thing that will happen or not but It deff allows for a good opportunity to do so.
but all that being said, again, you can always host your own game.

[Yondaime]

1v1 imo is also a dumb idea, there will be people just feasting making new accounts for elo there is one problem. 2nd problem if someone d/c's that just ruins the whole game as their are 2 players. 3. Dota is a team game, all someone has to do is pick a gay hero carry or tower pusher and bam gg.

I am against this.

[randomloser]

Honestly cheating aside if you do the 1 vs 1 it should probably be an ar same hero kind of deal. Not saying this to be mean but too many guys will be trying to last pick counters in this kind of game. Maybe separated stats for 1 vs 1 and team games would be in order. 3 vs 3 while being fun at times are generally easily ruined by leavers or accidental disconnects. Generally playing a man down with 3 open lanes sucks. Maybe a 3 vs 3 om kind of match could be fun though at least you wouldn't be completely screwed by a leaver in that case.

[VirusHunter]

nah yonda i remember back in the day when 3v3's were popular. you could easily win a 2v3 and sometimes the heros you pick would make a difference. but its always about whos behind the computer screen.

[suckmyclick]

well in my opinion the a-bal games and HR games are useless... they sounded like a good idea. but barely anybody ever plays on those bots. so i think adding 1v1 or 3v3 or even both would be a much better usage than running those abal and HR games for nobody to play. can anyone agree to that?

[GoogleAdsense[BoT]]

instead of having auto balanced or hr games which nobody ever joins. how about trying to make a new apem bot but instead of 5v5, make it 3v3 or 1v1. I feel like it would be really cool if we could do 3 on 3's so each hero gets to solo there own lane in the beginning. Or if you made one bot -apemom so we could 1v1 eachother.

!Support

What about leave AutoBal: Not removed. and let's discuss about to change just mode instead autobalance -sdem to apem or arem? Try to make any difference. But don't turn autobalance its like if autobalance is not working people can get stack. :S

[suckmyclick]

there is no point to add another normal apem arem or sdem bot. the 1 bot we have now is enough. there are always those bots up and running and it wouldnt make sense to have another one. this topic is about adding 3v3 or 1v1 by removing hr or abal

[GoogleAdsense[BoT]]

You can count on me. I completely agree, this is like 3v3 fun mode:?

[shinji_]

These 1v1 and 3v3 games are fun. I used to host them and still play them sometimes ih.

I think they would certainly fill, if only because they require less people to start.

The stacking problem could be solved by making the 3v3 games sp, but would prevent playing with friends.

It would be cool if a -sh command could be added to the 1v1 if both players vote on it.

[NutzSucksHard]

If 1v1 mode is put on bot. This should be the set-up :

• HCL : apemomnp / apomnp
• Stats shouldn't count. If it does, for sure some will cheat it and it will be the world problem to clear this out. **
• No autoban on the bot. So whenever one of the players want to leave, they're free to do it.
• Reason of making it autohost? : People doesn't like to wait in queue to host a game. (I only see that reason, otherwise make it yourself)
• All dota rules applies to this game mode.

This is some 'addition'. I don't know if THAT can be done with bots. Reason it is apart. Also, it will change the way of stats. :

**
FIRST WHAT WE PLAY? : If possible, you can make two mode that can be voted. I.e : APEMSHNP or APOMSHNP. If none vote before game start, HCL should be by default either mode I've show above. Command would be something like !votemode 1 /// !votemode 2 or something like !votemode apemomshnp (they gotta type the mode they want to vote, if both vote the same mode, the bot should set it).

SECOND, READY?!?! : Maybe also put a command that wait for the other player to type !ready. If this command isn't done in two minutes after you joined lobby, you should get autokicked. By typing ready, it's like when you type !spoofcheck. The bot should spoof you once you type !ready. Then start after all is good.

THIRD, ARE YOU A WARRIOR? STATS? : On these bot there could be stats, but not with normal. Like on HR BOT, there's different stats than in normal autohost. Hope I'm clear. Also, these stats should not be elo. But something called HONOR points. More honor you get, more tittle you win. i.e : 0-9 honor = New player(no title) / 10-19 = Fighter / 20-29 = Warrior / 30-39 = Gladiators / 40-49 = Assassin / 50-59 = unstoppable / 60-69 Grim Reaper etc. Let your imagination go for the name. .... 1 victory = 2 honor. One lose = 1. It should also show your Win/Lose stats and KDA such creep one.
So instead of i.e : NutzSucksHard has joined the game (said by bot). It should be like NutzSucksHard The *title* has joined the game.
i.e : ENT7 :NutzSucksHard The Gladiator has joined the game.
**

YES I have big imagination . Also, winning 1 honor everytime you lose is an OPTION!. If you guys prefer 0honor = lost // 1honor = win... It can be it. But some people will never touch one title. (That's my crazy addition, yes, crazy, feel free for opinions).

To prevent leaver : -1 honor should be given to people that left before 90% of the games is done. Still, no ban should be applied, only a honor lost. Once someone leave, game should be autorehost after one min (wich mean the other one forfeit). Every three month, the one with most 'honor' should have an Honor name in forum, like the champion ones but only ONE can have it. This way, the bot will be way way way more popular, it will look like a competition. Also, every three month, stats should be reboot as for a 'new competition'. Only one 'honor' forum name can be handle. So you got to defend it!.. If we found people cheating, stats reset and a ban will follow as rule of dota doesn't allow account boosting.... Still I know, some will tyr to cheat. Guys, let's play fair!

So for the 1v1 if all my idea can be add I would play it often *-* ahahaha ... Naw, I don't think uakf.b will spend that much of time on my idea >.<

When you !sd. Should look like this or something like this!...
[spoiler=!sd looks][NutzSucksHard] HONOR : [Amount], he's a Tittle (if possible to add other put normal stuff) and has played -amount of game* here; Win/Lose : 100/0 / HERO K/D/A : 825/300/610 (8.25/3/6.1). Creep : 8980/780/1180 (89.8/7.8/11.8). T/R/C : 55/22/0[/spoiler]

3v3 set-up (more normal here):

• HCL : APEM / SDEM / SD / AP
• Stats should counts
• At the moment someone leave before 5 min, all should apply the !draw command or game should be autorestarted.
• autoban is on for first two leavers. 2v3 can be won by the 2 players. I've won many games 3v5 2v5.
• Reason of making it ? : People dislike to lane with people that are bad. If you fail on your lane, you're the only one to blame. Game lenght. (Less long)
• All dota rules applies to this game mode.

EDIT : [spoiler=]For the title. You can put the number of honor you need to reach the title higher, same, lower... All will depend of the gain per win. If you win only one honor per win. I think my set-up is good. If you win 2 honor. Maybe put it a bit higher to gain title. 200 honor (if 1 honor won per game) God Of Dota should be the title. Keep in mind it egal to 200 win.. Thats a bunch [/spoiler]

[aRt)Y]

Anyone still interested? The OP doesn't seem so.. Last visited:Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:27 pm

Could anyone also give me the full bot game name so I can get some stats concerning play ratio.

[suckmyclick]

Anyone still interested? The OP doesn't seem so.. Last visited:Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:27 pm

Could anyone also give me the full bot game name so I can get some stats concerning play ratio.

well i am still interested in this. this thread has been up for so long and no admins have made any actions toward this suggestions. there is no full bot game name because the admins didn't make it happen