Good to know tho, thats one hell of a bug

Moderator: Oversight Staff
aRt)Y wrote:@hazardous input for 1) ?
bezdak wrote:Because most on people playing it but not the mode setters have no idea about the glitch. Changing builder is pretty much a necessity after early game, since builders are not balanced and if you don't know the glitch, only randomly join an -ap mode and get ban for something you don't know about is rly odd. For this glitch only a mode setter should be punished imo.
HazarDous wrote:aRt)Y wrote:@hazardous input for 1) ?bezdak wrote:Because most on people playing it but not the mode setters have no idea about the glitch. Changing builder is pretty much a necessity after early game, since builders are not balanced and if you don't know the glitch, only randomly join an -ap mode and get ban for something you don't know about is rly odd. For this glitch only a mode setter should be punished imo.
Since this should be temporary ( @broud3r ), I'd just go for the easier path. That is, banning the mode altogether as it is simple; easy to announce, easy to enforce for mods. On the opposite side, allowing mode but banning switching seems to be a mess, hard to explain to users & hard to enforce.
Return to “Suggestion Archive”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests